Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Ranged Builds Thread
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="FrogReaver" data-source="post: 9670872" data-attributes="member: 6795602"><p>Agreed</p><p></p><p>No idea how you are getting this</p><p></p><p>Or this</p><p></p><p>Each enemy targeted by a spell that can prevent them from acting that provides a repeated save/attempt to end the condition is worth about 2 uses of frighten. The math on this is below.</p><p></p><p>Each use of frighten has a 60% chance to cause an enemy to lose a turn (you'll only use it when that's a possibility). Thus, 2x frightens will be 1.2 turns denied.</p><p></p><p>A use of a 60% reoccuring save spell will on average prevent 0.6 + 0.6*0.6 + 0.6*0.6*0.6 = 1.18 turns (in a 3 round fight) or 0.6 + 0.6*0.6 + 0.6*0.6*0.6 + 0.6*0.6*0.6*0.6 (in a 4 round fight) = 1.31.</p><p></p><p>As you can see, a single enemy targeted by a repeating save spell that denies actions will deny about as many as 2x frightens.</p><p></p><p>Then, I'd estimate a single level 2 spell can likely target 2 enemies (tasha's laughter is guaranteed to do so with a good effect).</p><p></p><p>In which case 1x web = 4x frightens. Except you need a web for each short rest and since you've given this fighter 2 based on the number of actions surges then that's 3x web's required to match up with 4 superiority dice all going to frighten over 2 short rests.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Not sure how you are getting this</p><p></p><p>Agreed.</p><p></p><p>I forget about that restriction.</p><p></p><p></p><p>There's way to much you are not accounting for in your methodology.</p><p></p><p>1. Each of your EB attacks is worth less than the battlemasters. This cascades to things like action surge and seeking/quicken. In which case either Action Surge should be worth more than 1 attack or seeking/quicken should be worth less than 1.</p><p></p><p>2. One obvious miss on your part is that you aren't accounting for the +18 damage provided by maneuver dice per short rest. Or for 2 short rests that's +54 damage. That alone is worth nearly 11 EB attacks.</p><p></p><p>3. It doesn't appear you are accounting for archery style being applied to action surge either, though that's probably only a bit more than 0.6 attacks.</p><p></p><p>4. Same thing for the +1 mod as for archery style.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Those things still have to connect and you have to compare the value of what your ally would have done without cloud of daggers to that.</p><p></p><p></p><p>The effect is comparable enough, actually a bit better.</p><p></p><p></p><p>I think by the time the battlemaster gets 5 manuever dice (level 7) then you either need an extra level 2 slot or some level 3 slots mixed in to break even on the control aspects. I mean you can load up on control options, so it's possible you may can target weak saves or hit more enemies than 2/3, etc, all of which may provide additional values to the spells in the comparison, but none of that is nearly a sure enough thing to add it directly in.</p><p></p><p></p><p>I'll go back and do a full pass on them.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Yes. My point was that there wouldn't be much left for things like shield and etc.</p><p></p><p></p><p>In my initial assessment I was wrongly converting those to sorcery points. Since you can't do that then I'd probably need to add another sorcerer level. But yes, at that point you would have the resources to do everything and shield.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="FrogReaver, post: 9670872, member: 6795602"] Agreed No idea how you are getting this Or this Each enemy targeted by a spell that can prevent them from acting that provides a repeated save/attempt to end the condition is worth about 2 uses of frighten. The math on this is below. Each use of frighten has a 60% chance to cause an enemy to lose a turn (you'll only use it when that's a possibility). Thus, 2x frightens will be 1.2 turns denied. A use of a 60% reoccuring save spell will on average prevent 0.6 + 0.6*0.6 + 0.6*0.6*0.6 = 1.18 turns (in a 3 round fight) or 0.6 + 0.6*0.6 + 0.6*0.6*0.6 + 0.6*0.6*0.6*0.6 (in a 4 round fight) = 1.31. As you can see, a single enemy targeted by a repeating save spell that denies actions will deny about as many as 2x frightens. Then, I'd estimate a single level 2 spell can likely target 2 enemies (tasha's laughter is guaranteed to do so with a good effect). In which case 1x web = 4x frightens. Except you need a web for each short rest and since you've given this fighter 2 based on the number of actions surges then that's 3x web's required to match up with 4 superiority dice all going to frighten over 2 short rests. Not sure how you are getting this Agreed. I forget about that restriction. There's way to much you are not accounting for in your methodology. 1. Each of your EB attacks is worth less than the battlemasters. This cascades to things like action surge and seeking/quicken. In which case either Action Surge should be worth more than 1 attack or seeking/quicken should be worth less than 1. 2. One obvious miss on your part is that you aren't accounting for the +18 damage provided by maneuver dice per short rest. Or for 2 short rests that's +54 damage. That alone is worth nearly 11 EB attacks. 3. It doesn't appear you are accounting for archery style being applied to action surge either, though that's probably only a bit more than 0.6 attacks. 4. Same thing for the +1 mod as for archery style. Those things still have to connect and you have to compare the value of what your ally would have done without cloud of daggers to that. The effect is comparable enough, actually a bit better. I think by the time the battlemaster gets 5 manuever dice (level 7) then you either need an extra level 2 slot or some level 3 slots mixed in to break even on the control aspects. I mean you can load up on control options, so it's possible you may can target weak saves or hit more enemies than 2/3, etc, all of which may provide additional values to the spells in the comparison, but none of that is nearly a sure enough thing to add it directly in. I'll go back and do a full pass on them. Yes. My point was that there wouldn't be much left for things like shield and etc. In my initial assessment I was wrongly converting those to sorcery points. Since you can't do that then I'd probably need to add another sorcerer level. But yes, at that point you would have the resources to do everything and shield. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Ranged Builds Thread
Top