Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Ranged Defender: Doable?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="mneme" data-source="post: 5547792" data-attributes="member: 59248"><p>He usually figures it out after he gets knocked unconcious a few times. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /> More specifically, if your druid is getitng enemies to attack him rather than not be able to attack at all (or at tack the defender) he's playing defender--and he isn't very good at it. The sentinel can manage it better, despite being a leader, because he can take controller powers and use his pet as a pseudo-controller (if, yes, it doesn't die. But then, a defender can die too).</p><p></p><p></p><p>The problem is that this is either awful or problematic. A defender's assets consist largely of stickiness, threat, and defenses. It's possible for them to do without threat (if the stickiness and defenses are good enough), and even sometimes without stickiness if the threat is strong enough to act as pseudo-stickiness, but the defenses--and using them actively, is non-optional.</p><p></p><p>The problem with a ranged defender who largely acts on ranged opponents is that melee opponents are far more common. So it's a trap.</p><p></p><p>The problem with a ranged defender who can keep out of range and force melee opponents to close is that it's largley unbalanced; you're not taking hits, so you're not really using your defenses as one of your assets in this situation. So if it's too weak to work, it's just weak; if it's weak enough to be effective, you're being a controller/striker with defenses like a defender, and that's just too much.</p><p></p><p>Thus, the idea of a pet defender.</p><p></p><p>Regarding a pet defender, I think it would be -easy- to make one a Shaman subclass. Remember, the shaman doesn't need defender defenses/HP; only the pet needs this. The defender shaman can probably get away with defender defenses and mage (ok, probably cleric) HP, as if you keep the existing "when the spirit dies, you take 5+1/2 level" mechanic, you're effectively taking half damage (or less) and getting double healing. Drop the leader healing for better defenses (or at least better defenses for the spirit) and a way to let the spirit mark enemies and you're nearly good to go (you probably a defender spirit -not- to vanish when a hit gets through its resistance, as then it stops defending, and that's kinda bad).</p><p></p><p>Also, for a ranger style pet defender, I'm not seeing the problem with "the pet can die". Of course the pet can die. If it does, the party defender is dead! Don't let that happen! You know, the beastmaster ranger in a party can die too; the player can keep playing the beast until it also dies or the ranger's raised, but, well, the party's down a ranger. The fact that the player can play a far weaker verison of their character once the "business" side of the pair is dispatched is an a feature of the build--not a sign that the ranger is not a true striker.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="mneme, post: 5547792, member: 59248"] He usually figures it out after he gets knocked unconcious a few times. :) More specifically, if your druid is getitng enemies to attack him rather than not be able to attack at all (or at tack the defender) he's playing defender--and he isn't very good at it. The sentinel can manage it better, despite being a leader, because he can take controller powers and use his pet as a pseudo-controller (if, yes, it doesn't die. But then, a defender can die too). The problem is that this is either awful or problematic. A defender's assets consist largely of stickiness, threat, and defenses. It's possible for them to do without threat (if the stickiness and defenses are good enough), and even sometimes without stickiness if the threat is strong enough to act as pseudo-stickiness, but the defenses--and using them actively, is non-optional. The problem with a ranged defender who largely acts on ranged opponents is that melee opponents are far more common. So it's a trap. The problem with a ranged defender who can keep out of range and force melee opponents to close is that it's largley unbalanced; you're not taking hits, so you're not really using your defenses as one of your assets in this situation. So if it's too weak to work, it's just weak; if it's weak enough to be effective, you're being a controller/striker with defenses like a defender, and that's just too much. Thus, the idea of a pet defender. Regarding a pet defender, I think it would be -easy- to make one a Shaman subclass. Remember, the shaman doesn't need defender defenses/HP; only the pet needs this. The defender shaman can probably get away with defender defenses and mage (ok, probably cleric) HP, as if you keep the existing "when the spirit dies, you take 5+1/2 level" mechanic, you're effectively taking half damage (or less) and getting double healing. Drop the leader healing for better defenses (or at least better defenses for the spirit) and a way to let the spirit mark enemies and you're nearly good to go (you probably a defender spirit -not- to vanish when a hit gets through its resistance, as then it stops defending, and that's kinda bad). Also, for a ranger style pet defender, I'm not seeing the problem with "the pet can die". Of course the pet can die. If it does, the party defender is dead! Don't let that happen! You know, the beastmaster ranger in a party can die too; the player can keep playing the beast until it also dies or the ranger's raised, but, well, the party's down a ranger. The fact that the player can play a far weaker verison of their character once the "business" side of the pair is dispatched is an a feature of the build--not a sign that the ranger is not a true striker. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Ranged Defender: Doable?
Top