Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="andy3k" data-source="post: 5548621" data-attributes="member: 6674918">My concept for the aura 1 on an ally is:<ol> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">Those in the aura would be penalized for attacking anyone but the defender's pet (not the defender himself). This aura would often go on the pet but could also be switched to another ally when the situation calls for it.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">The punishment would NOT be an attack from the aura'ed ally because that is a leader function and would hardly help the pet who doesn't normally attack or the leaders/controllers who aren't good at melee or close attacks. The aura could provide an auto attack or damage OR the defender (if in range) could do a ranged attack against the offending foe as punishment.</li> </ol>I like the idea of putting the aura on a foe but I agree that it should be done with an attack. Maybe that is one of the at-will powers: if you hit then you do damage and put the aura on the foe. This would be the anti-ranged attacker part of the defender and would be used against an artillery or controller foe that you want to keep in line. Of course, putting the aura on an ally does not require an attack. Sweet?</blockquote>