Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Ranger Feats
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Ysgarran" data-source="post: 1071953" data-attributes="member: 709"><p><strong>Re: Re: Re: Re: Manyshot works with Shot on the Run</strong></p><p></p><p>OK, before I was so rudely interrupted by the power outage I had a very long response typed in. Power went out before I could hit 'Submit Reply'. Sigh.</p><p></p><p>Anyways, I think I understand your point but I think it is still a very poorly worded feat. I'm going to word the feat according to the intent that you defined. (let me know if I get this wrong).</p><p>"When using the standard attack action, that character may take a single attack with a ranged weapon in the middle of a move. You can move both before and after the attack, provided that your total distance moved is not greater than your speed."</p><p></p><p>My reading of the feat says something like this:</p><p>"When the character is taking a move action that character may take a standard attack action with a ranged weapon in the middle of a move. You can move both before and after the attack, provided that your total distance moved is not greater than your speed."</p><p></p><p>Does this capture the different intrepretations of the feat?</p><p></p><p>The 'attack option' is clearly defined as a standard action. (According to the Table that defines the different kinds of options). </p><p></p><p>The real question is whether the phrase: "When using the attack action with a ranged weapon" applies to the 'kind of attack' the user takes in the middle of the move or whether the phrase applies to the feat 'shot on the move' itself.</p><p></p><p>Having written it down in that fashion I'm now thinking that you are correct and my original reading was wrong. </p><p></p><p>later,</p><p>Ysgarran.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Ysgarran, post: 1071953, member: 709"] [b]Re: Re: Re: Re: Manyshot works with Shot on the Run[/b] OK, before I was so rudely interrupted by the power outage I had a very long response typed in. Power went out before I could hit 'Submit Reply'. Sigh. Anyways, I think I understand your point but I think it is still a very poorly worded feat. I'm going to word the feat according to the intent that you defined. (let me know if I get this wrong). "When using the standard attack action, that character may take a single attack with a ranged weapon in the middle of a move. You can move both before and after the attack, provided that your total distance moved is not greater than your speed." My reading of the feat says something like this: "When the character is taking a move action that character may take a standard attack action with a ranged weapon in the middle of a move. You can move both before and after the attack, provided that your total distance moved is not greater than your speed." Does this capture the different intrepretations of the feat? The 'attack option' is clearly defined as a standard action. (According to the Table that defines the different kinds of options). The real question is whether the phrase: "When using the attack action with a ranged weapon" applies to the 'kind of attack' the user takes in the middle of the move or whether the phrase applies to the feat 'shot on the move' itself. Having written it down in that fashion I'm now thinking that you are correct and my original reading was wrong. later, Ysgarran. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Ranger Feats
Top