Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Ranger: Scout Preview up!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Stalker0" data-source="post: 5358586" data-attributes="member: 5889"><p>So far this ranger looks decent.</p><p></p><p>I will applaud allowing martial classes to once again be good with ranged weapons without pigeon holding them into archer classes. This ranger can mix in ranged attacks with his two weapon style very seamlessly.</p><p></p><p>YET...what I love is that the incentive is to get into melee. One problem I had with the 4e core ranger is that archery is just so powerful. Not only are you doing as much damage as the melee ranger (heck often more) but you can be 20 squares away in complete safety and attack who you please.</p><p></p><p>This ranger can do the same...but for maximum benefit has to get into his opponent's face.</p><p></p><p>I like the mix and match of dual wield styles, that's pretty nice. I do question whether +2 dmg is worth missing out on a +1 to attack...though with power strike the larger die weapons get a tad more extra benefit that might help.</p><p></p><p>For those comparing this ranger to a twin strike one, one other thing to note is that this ranger must hit the same opponent with both attacks, with twin strike you could hit two.</p><p></p><p>I find this especially important because of minions. Minions are normally the bane of strikers...but the core ranger with twin strike can do pretty well. This ranger would have more difficulty.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Stalker0, post: 5358586, member: 5889"] So far this ranger looks decent. I will applaud allowing martial classes to once again be good with ranged weapons without pigeon holding them into archer classes. This ranger can mix in ranged attacks with his two weapon style very seamlessly. YET...what I love is that the incentive is to get into melee. One problem I had with the 4e core ranger is that archery is just so powerful. Not only are you doing as much damage as the melee ranger (heck often more) but you can be 20 squares away in complete safety and attack who you please. This ranger can do the same...but for maximum benefit has to get into his opponent's face. I like the mix and match of dual wield styles, that's pretty nice. I do question whether +2 dmg is worth missing out on a +1 to attack...though with power strike the larger die weapons get a tad more extra benefit that might help. For those comparing this ranger to a twin strike one, one other thing to note is that this ranger must hit the same opponent with both attacks, with twin strike you could hit two. I find this especially important because of minions. Minions are normally the bane of strikers...but the core ranger with twin strike can do pretty well. This ranger would have more difficulty. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Ranger: Scout Preview up!
Top