Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="greycastle" data-source="post: 980799" data-attributes="member: 11130">It would seem that if the rangers bonus feats only work when they wear light armour or none, then they are not as 'worth-while' as if done otherwise...considering a fighter could much quicker gain the same feats 'permanently'. Now also considering most rangers already wear light armour, why the restriction? And why not, at worst, simply give them a slight penalty for the much more restrictive nature of heavy armour...though on that point, if heavy armour restricts your ability to use two weapons, how is it that you gain your entire dex bonus on attacks with a bow? Amazons (either in truth or myth) used to even cut off their shooting arm breast respectfully, to Not suffer disadvantages from shooting a bow. Now while i'm not suggesting female characters now should suffer penalties to bows, or that characters in heavy armour should gain penalties (good gods no!), why is it that the ranger feats are virtual and not simply bonus, as the fighter recieves?If i'm wrong on any points, please feel free to correct me.</blockquote>