Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="LokiDR" data-source="post: 448193" data-attributes="member: 6239">DC stomping?&nbsp; I have no idea what you mean.&nbsp; If you are refering to a fighter making lots of noise then I would note that only one out the &quot;standard&quot; party has the ability to be quiet.But if you never used the favored enemy, and rarely used spells, doen't you think they are wasted class abilties?&nbsp; You played a skilled fighter.&nbsp; Is that all the ranger is?&nbsp; Shouldn't there be abilites that help out with this then, instead of favored enemy?And for the record, I don't like all this DM help talk.&nbsp; Should a DM change a published module to account for a ranger?&nbsp; Where do rangers fit in RttToEE or City of the Spider Queen?&nbsp; If I have a mix of encounters, should I make sure that tracking is neccessary for some encounters?&nbsp; No.&nbsp; I say that, just like a DM shouldn't intentionally exclude any class, they shouldn't focus on any either.&nbsp; Encounters should not be aimed at specific classes, with the possible exception of traps.&nbsp; Traps have been around for a long time though, and tracking as a special abiltity is fairly recent.&nbsp; I don't agree with any class that needs the DM to make special provisions for them.&nbsp; Ranger needs the most of those provisions.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="LokiDR, post: 448193, member: 6239"] DC stomping? I have no idea what you mean. If you are refering to a fighter making lots of noise then I would note that only one out the "standard" party has the ability to be quiet. But if you never used the favored enemy, and rarely used spells, doen't you think they are wasted class abilties? You played a skilled fighter. Is that all the ranger is? Shouldn't there be abilites that help out with this then, instead of favored enemy? And for the record, I don't like all this DM help talk. Should a DM change a published module to account for a ranger? Where do rangers fit in RttToEE or City of the Spider Queen? If I have a mix of encounters, should I make sure that tracking is neccessary for some encounters? No. I say that, just like a DM shouldn't intentionally exclude any class, they shouldn't focus on any either. Encounters should not be aimed at specific classes, with the possible exception of traps. Traps have been around for a long time though, and tracking as a special abiltity is fairly recent. I don't agree with any class that needs the DM to make special provisions for them. Ranger needs the most of those provisions. [/QUOTE]

Verification