Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Ranger's Twin Strike ...
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="DracoSuave" data-source="post: 4842732" data-attributes="member: 71571"><p>You can still take Toughness.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>You can take an item that gives you bonus hit points.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>That's true, if you're taking a -lot-. But you don't need to take a lot for Defensive Mobility to be useful- You only need to take -one-.</p><p></p><p>But the same argument in reverse. The two-weapon-fighting bonus is an -excellent- advantage, should you find yourself in a situation with two weapons and in each hand. But the archery ranger doesn't find himself in -that- situation either. </p><p></p><p>And not all archers take shift-and-pew-pew powers (tho they are good options to be sure.) For those that take the non-shifty big-heavy-damage-PEW-PEW powers, Defensive Mobility is still better than Toughness. </p><p></p><p>As well, DM opens up the option of drawing OAs so your fighter gets a free CC attack now and then. Toughness opens up the option of taking five more damage. Which, again, drop in the bucket.</p><p></p><p>I don't think the situation is as 'obvious' as people think it is. 5 hitpoints is an extra what to your surge value? 1 point? 2 at best? Sure it gets better at higher tiers, but so much that it becomes must have for a ranged character?</p><p></p><p>If you're going ranged, your defenses are of the DO NOT HIT ME variety, not the HIT ME LESS HARD variety. Avoidance, rather then Mitigation. And Defensive Mobility increases your Avoidance while you run-and-gun, while Mitigation does not protect you against your bane.</p><p></p><p>Toughness does NOTHING against Soldier monsters, which are the weakness of a ranged Striker. Defensive Mobility does. And that's the -real- bottom line.</p><p></p><p></p><p>In pure comparison, yes both builds get Prime Shot, but archery rangers will actually use it, whereas twf rangers will not. In converse, twf rangers NEED the two-weapon advantage to be competitive with archery rangers in the damage area, but archery rangers don't need to TWF in order to do damage; TWF+Superior weapon=Archery Ranger+martial weapon.</p><p></p><p>You -can't- look at it as strict 'So and So gets X class features and So and So gets Y so X > Y' when you look at the sum of the parts.</p><p></p><p>Bottom line, if you take TWF, you're taking an extra feat to be equivalent to archery rangers in the damage catagory, either by taking Defensive Mobility to be as mobile as an archer just to get that 'useful' two-weapon fighting advantage, or you're taking a Superior Weapon feat just to get the same damage output.</p><p></p><p>It is -definately- not a wash when you look at all parts put together.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="DracoSuave, post: 4842732, member: 71571"] You can still take Toughness. You can take an item that gives you bonus hit points. That's true, if you're taking a -lot-. But you don't need to take a lot for Defensive Mobility to be useful- You only need to take -one-. But the same argument in reverse. The two-weapon-fighting bonus is an -excellent- advantage, should you find yourself in a situation with two weapons and in each hand. But the archery ranger doesn't find himself in -that- situation either. And not all archers take shift-and-pew-pew powers (tho they are good options to be sure.) For those that take the non-shifty big-heavy-damage-PEW-PEW powers, Defensive Mobility is still better than Toughness. As well, DM opens up the option of drawing OAs so your fighter gets a free CC attack now and then. Toughness opens up the option of taking five more damage. Which, again, drop in the bucket. I don't think the situation is as 'obvious' as people think it is. 5 hitpoints is an extra what to your surge value? 1 point? 2 at best? Sure it gets better at higher tiers, but so much that it becomes must have for a ranged character? If you're going ranged, your defenses are of the DO NOT HIT ME variety, not the HIT ME LESS HARD variety. Avoidance, rather then Mitigation. And Defensive Mobility increases your Avoidance while you run-and-gun, while Mitigation does not protect you against your bane. Toughness does NOTHING against Soldier monsters, which are the weakness of a ranged Striker. Defensive Mobility does. And that's the -real- bottom line. In pure comparison, yes both builds get Prime Shot, but archery rangers will actually use it, whereas twf rangers will not. In converse, twf rangers NEED the two-weapon advantage to be competitive with archery rangers in the damage area, but archery rangers don't need to TWF in order to do damage; TWF+Superior weapon=Archery Ranger+martial weapon. You -can't- look at it as strict 'So and So gets X class features and So and So gets Y so X > Y' when you look at the sum of the parts. Bottom line, if you take TWF, you're taking an extra feat to be equivalent to archery rangers in the damage catagory, either by taking Defensive Mobility to be as mobile as an archer just to get that 'useful' two-weapon fighting advantage, or you're taking a Superior Weapon feat just to get the same damage output. It is -definately- not a wash when you look at all parts put together. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Ranger's Twin Strike ...
Top