Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
Rank the D&D 3.5 classes!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="James Gasik" data-source="post: 8607617" data-attributes="member: 6877472"><p>I don't think it was nonsense, you can establish a metric by which classes can be measured. The problem is, each player has a different game experience. It is quite possible that the only Druid you ever played with was lackluster, the DM said some of their spells, like <em>entangle</em> don't work in dungeons, their animal companions die all the time, and wild shape seems pointless.</p><p></p><p>In another game, the Druid may be the most powerful character, and makes most of the other classes seem pointless and lame. All a tier list does is indicate <strong>potential</strong>. A class with access to great spells, lots of skills, and powerful ways to defend themselves, destroy or inhibit their enemies, and a lot of "narrative power" has a higher ceiling than one whose schtick is "martial weapons, heavy armor, shields, feats, good BAB, weak saves and no skills". Where the floor is, however, is a bit subjective.</p><p></p><p>Fighter was intended to be a simple class, but just like the Sorcerer, it proves to be one of the hardest and most complex, because you really need to plan ahead and carefully consider each build choice, because there are few (or no) opportunities to change them. I saw a lot of early Fighters avoid "situational" abilities, focusing on Weapon Focus, Weapon Specialization, Toughness, Improved Initiative, etc., etc., wanting to have basic, numerical, and "always on" abilities. I remember in my very first game a player declaring their Combat Reflexes Feat to be completely useless, because they had no reach, and enemies had no real reason to try to get away from them.</p><p></p><p>And they refused to accept <em>enlarge person</em> because it would lower their precious Dexterity. In the very next campaign, I played a Cleric with the Strength Domain and a longspear, and I got opportunity attacks all the time, to the point that enemies started to avoid me like the plague- fine by me, as I was a spellcaster and had all the spells to keep my party fighting (and once the Barbarian heard "3d6 weapon damage", he was begging me to use my daily Enlarge on him).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="James Gasik, post: 8607617, member: 6877472"] I don't think it was nonsense, you can establish a metric by which classes can be measured. The problem is, each player has a different game experience. It is quite possible that the only Druid you ever played with was lackluster, the DM said some of their spells, like [I]entangle[/I] don't work in dungeons, their animal companions die all the time, and wild shape seems pointless. In another game, the Druid may be the most powerful character, and makes most of the other classes seem pointless and lame. All a tier list does is indicate [B]potential[/B]. A class with access to great spells, lots of skills, and powerful ways to defend themselves, destroy or inhibit their enemies, and a lot of "narrative power" has a higher ceiling than one whose schtick is "martial weapons, heavy armor, shields, feats, good BAB, weak saves and no skills". Where the floor is, however, is a bit subjective. Fighter was intended to be a simple class, but just like the Sorcerer, it proves to be one of the hardest and most complex, because you really need to plan ahead and carefully consider each build choice, because there are few (or no) opportunities to change them. I saw a lot of early Fighters avoid "situational" abilities, focusing on Weapon Focus, Weapon Specialization, Toughness, Improved Initiative, etc., etc., wanting to have basic, numerical, and "always on" abilities. I remember in my very first game a player declaring their Combat Reflexes Feat to be completely useless, because they had no reach, and enemies had no real reason to try to get away from them. And they refused to accept [I]enlarge person[/I] because it would lower their precious Dexterity. In the very next campaign, I played a Cleric with the Strength Domain and a longspear, and I got opportunity attacks all the time, to the point that enemies started to avoid me like the plague- fine by me, as I was a spellcaster and had all the spells to keep my party fighting (and once the Barbarian heard "3d6 weapon damage", he was begging me to use my daily Enlarge on him). [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
Rank the D&D 3.5 classes!
Top