Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Valiantheart" data-source="post: 1814030" data-attributes="member: 10165">Well to skip the 5 pages of argument....I dont see the theives actions in this instance as evil.&nbsp; His intent is not to cause harm to others merely to benefit himself.&nbsp; In that respect its a purely neutral activity.&nbsp; Also, the dead are dead.&nbsp; What do they need money for anymore.&nbsp; Thats pretty much the standard means to acquire loot in D&amp;D.If the thief knew all of his comrads where ok and not bleeding out on the floor then again I see nothing wrong with his actions.&nbsp; He merely wished to avoid the messy moral intanglements that this thread has spawned.I would consider the thieves actions evil if he:1) Threatened someone guarding the luggage with bodily harm if they didnt leave him to it.2) Finished off the not quite dead yet train passengers3) Knew his buddies were potentially dying as he looked for loot.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Valiantheart, post: 1814030, member: 10165"] Well to skip the 5 pages of argument.... I dont see the theives actions in this instance as evil. His intent is not to cause harm to others merely to benefit himself. In that respect its a purely neutral activity. Also, the dead are dead. What do they need money for anymore. Thats pretty much the standard means to acquire loot in D&D. If the thief knew all of his comrads where ok and not bleeding out on the floor then again I see nothing wrong with his actions. He merely wished to avoid the messy moral intanglements that this thread has spawned. I would consider the thieves actions evil if he: 1) Threatened someone guarding the luggage with bodily harm if they didnt leave him to it. 2) Finished off the not quite dead yet train passengers 3) Knew his buddies were potentially dying as he looked for loot. [/QUOTE]

Verification