Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Erik Mona" data-source="post: 1000203" data-attributes="member: 2174">Iron Chef said:&gt;&gt;&gt;Does this mean you are looking at a way not to aliennate non-subscribers with subscriber-only content?&gt;&gt;&gt;Correct.Iron Chef, I understand and appreciate that you don't care for Polyhedron. That message has definitely come through loud and clear. But I would suggest that just because _you_ don't like something does not make it &quot;consistently awful.&quot; Lots of people obviously disagree with that point of view based upon posts to threads (to say nothing of emails to the magazines themselves, comments at conventions, etc.). That kind of hyperbole doesn't help any discussion about how to &quot;fix&quot; the problems that many readers have with the current format of the magazine, which is something I think a lot of readers are probably interested in.I'm honestly interested in everyone's feedback, and will do everything I can to make the magazine as good a value and as fun a read (and play!) as possible. But frothing at the mouth about how much the magazine sucks is not particularly helpful to the cause of improving the magazine, and does little more than make me (and others) completely write off the rest of what you have to say, which may very well have a lot of good points to it.--Erik Mona</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Erik Mona, post: 1000203, member: 2174"] Iron Chef said: >>> Does this mean you are looking at a way not to aliennate non-subscribers with subscriber-only content? >>> Correct. Iron Chef, I understand and appreciate that you don't care for Polyhedron. That message has definitely come through loud and clear. But I would suggest that just because _you_ don't like something does not make it "consistently awful." Lots of people obviously disagree with that point of view based upon posts to threads (to say nothing of emails to the magazines themselves, comments at conventions, etc.). That kind of hyperbole doesn't help any discussion about how to "fix" the problems that many readers have with the current format of the magazine, which is something I think a lot of readers are probably interested in. I'm honestly interested in everyone's feedback, and will do everything I can to make the magazine as good a value and as fun a read (and play!) as possible. But frothing at the mouth about how much the magazine sucks is not particularly helpful to the cause of improving the magazine, and does little more than make me (and others) completely write off the rest of what you have to say, which may very well have a lot of good points to it. --Erik Mona [/QUOTE]

Verification