Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Teflon Billy" data-source="post: 1000449" data-attributes="member: 264">Hmm.I know I don't speak for everyone, but this certainly isn;t my point of view at all. I quite like some of the stuff in Poly, on about the same scale that I like some of the stuff in Dungeon.I really liked both Omega World and Iron Lords of Jupiter...I was lukewarm on Gumball Rally or whatever it was called, but certainly don't think that it's &quot;dragging it out, letting it die a messy death and generating mountains of bad memories&quot; or anything of the sort.I really liked Dungeon of the Fire Opal and a couple of other items, but have never been truly enraged by the lack in quality.I think one FR Adventure as the sole Module in an issue is not a great idea, but guess what? So does the editor.I hope Dungeon stays around. I think, if nothing else Dungeon has been exploring it's boundaries a bit since Mr. Mona took the helm, and if the results have been mixed, at least we know it's because an effort is being made to try something new occasionally instead of just staying the course.I'd much rather have an Iron Lords of Jupiter than any number of Armistice quality modules.I'm glad the Editorial Staff&nbsp; responds to reader criticism as quickly and efficiently as they do, but I would hate to think that shrill, overstated whining about the magazine being &quot;not worth saving&quot; does not drive them to never try a single new idea again.Becasue frankly, I have enough &quot;Dungeon-Crawl-by-theNumbers&quot; product to last me a lifetime.Hell, Jamis Buck has made it possible for me to generate it in basically no&nbsp; time <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)"&nbsp; data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="Teflon Billy, post: 1000449, member: 264"] Hmm. I know I don't speak for everyone, but this certainly isn;t my point of view at all. I quite like some of the stuff in Poly, on about the same scale that I like some of the stuff in Dungeon. I really liked both [b]Omega World[/b] and [b]Iron Lords of Jupiter[/b]...I was lukewarm on [b]Gumball Rally[/b] or whatever it was called, but certainly don't think that it's "dragging it out, letting it die a messy death and generating mountains of bad memories" or anything of the sort. I really liked [b]Dungeon of the Fire Opal[/b] and a couple of other items, but have never been truly [i]enraged[/i] by the lack in quality. I think one FR Adventure as the sole Module in an issue is not a great idea, but guess what? [i]So does the editor[/i]. I hope Dungeon stays around. I think, if nothing else Dungeon has been exploring it's boundaries a bit since Mr. Mona took the helm, and if the results have been mixed, at least we know it's because an effort is being made to try something new occasionally instead of just staying the course. I'd much rather have an [b]Iron Lords of Jupiter[/b] than any number of [b]Armistice[/b] quality modules. I'm glad the Editorial Staff responds to reader criticism as quickly and efficiently as they do, but I would hate to think that shrill, overstated whining about the magazine being "not worth saving" does not drive them to never try a single new idea again. Becasue frankly, I have enough "Dungeon-Crawl-by-theNumbers" product to last me a lifetime. Hell, [b]Jamis Buck[/b] has made it possible for me to generate it in basically no time :) [/QUOTE]

Verification