Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Rant About Recent Dungeon Magazines
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="arbados" data-source="post: 1002222" data-attributes="member: 2068"><p>Hey Erik Mona:</p><p>I am one person who has never complained about any Dungeon content and I have been getting the magazine since issue 1 which I am very proud of. I keep them all tightly bound and have a subscription. </p><p></p><p>I have always hated the persons who complain about content, world specific modules vs. generic, vile content vs non-vile content and every other complaint that has graced the pages since the first issue.</p><p></p><p>However, I feel I must let you know the opinion of a long time, calm subscriber.</p><p></p><p>For the first time ever I considered cancelling my subscribtion. No I do not like the poly side and have never found it useful, however, as long as the dungeon side maintained its quality its not a problem. I do feel that the lack of modules contained in each issue is a problem and this has swayed my opinion to cancelation. WoTC does not publish modules anymore it seems and Dungeon is now my place to get them. With there being, at times, 1 module per issue that is a problem. </p><p></p><p>The worst thing was the sealed vile content. I photocopy everything I use in dungeon and then store my magazines for the future. I have never even read the vile content module because it would force me to cut open the pages!!! That is just plain silly. I buy a magazine and expect that I can read all its content without the aid of a pair of scissors!</p><p></p><p>To give an objective side to the poly content (as one who does not like it) why don't you try to eleminate the numerous new mini-games and as mentioned previously focus on a couple so that future poly parts could give supplements to these mini games that have already been produced. </p><p></p><p>I do miss the old black and white paged magazines, but understand that the magazines appearance needs to keep pace with whats on the market. </p><p></p><p>However, try and keep the contents clear and easy to read. To much design/color/mish-mosh is not a good thing. It's annoying and hard to read.</p><p></p><p>Thanks for listening and I will keep my subscribtion going to see hopeful future changes in the right direction.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="arbados, post: 1002222, member: 2068"] Hey Erik Mona: I am one person who has never complained about any Dungeon content and I have been getting the magazine since issue 1 which I am very proud of. I keep them all tightly bound and have a subscription. I have always hated the persons who complain about content, world specific modules vs. generic, vile content vs non-vile content and every other complaint that has graced the pages since the first issue. However, I feel I must let you know the opinion of a long time, calm subscriber. For the first time ever I considered cancelling my subscribtion. No I do not like the poly side and have never found it useful, however, as long as the dungeon side maintained its quality its not a problem. I do feel that the lack of modules contained in each issue is a problem and this has swayed my opinion to cancelation. WoTC does not publish modules anymore it seems and Dungeon is now my place to get them. With there being, at times, 1 module per issue that is a problem. The worst thing was the sealed vile content. I photocopy everything I use in dungeon and then store my magazines for the future. I have never even read the vile content module because it would force me to cut open the pages!!! That is just plain silly. I buy a magazine and expect that I can read all its content without the aid of a pair of scissors! To give an objective side to the poly content (as one who does not like it) why don't you try to eleminate the numerous new mini-games and as mentioned previously focus on a couple so that future poly parts could give supplements to these mini games that have already been produced. I do miss the old black and white paged magazines, but understand that the magazines appearance needs to keep pace with whats on the market. However, try and keep the contents clear and easy to read. To much design/color/mish-mosh is not a good thing. It's annoying and hard to read. Thanks for listening and I will keep my subscribtion going to see hopeful future changes in the right direction. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Rant About Recent Dungeon Magazines
Top