Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Ranger REG" data-source="post: 1008936" data-attributes="member: 533">Re: Quickly, cuz it's lateWhile I'm happy you like Poly, I disagree with your criticism. For now, Poly is the only magazine that can and should support non-D&amp;D products from Wizards.I was devastated when Star Wars Gamer didn't last beyond ten issues. Now I'm glad they're back in the form of articles in Poly. I'm also glad that d20 Modern is also getting support despite the slow output of that line from WotC.To me, this makes Poly even more valuable to the other readers who play non-D&amp;D games from Wizards.Not to me. Perhaps it is better to put out 4 better-quality mini-games a year than 6 average-quality mini-games enforced by quota. I mean how many times have you played each of the mini-games that Poly puts out? Is it a one-shot? Twice?I can tell you, that among the mini-games produced so far, I find only one that is worth playing over and over again. Maybe because it caters to my own personal preference as well as my group's.As for supporting d20, Wizards is as much a part of the community as the rest of the d20 publishers, or do you deny the other non-D&amp;D games?Poly is still trying to find its niche, despite complaints from D&amp;D Purists (or is it Supremacists?), as well as expand their readership. While you may like the previous format, their accounting ledger shows it did not do to expand the sales of the magazine.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Ranger REG, post: 1008936, member: 533"] [b]Re: Quickly, cuz it's late[/b] While I'm happy you like [i]Poly,[/i] I disagree with your criticism. For now, [i]Poly[/i] is the only magazine that can and should support non-[i]D&D[/i] products from Wizards. I was devastated when [i]Star Wars Gamer[/i] didn't last beyond ten issues. Now I'm glad they're back in the form of articles in [i]Poly.[/i] I'm also glad that [i]d20 Modern[/i] is also getting support despite the slow output of that line from WotC. To me, this makes [i]Poly[/i] even more valuable to the other readers who play non-[i]D&D[/i] games from Wizards. Not to me. Perhaps it is better to put out 4 better-quality mini-games a year than 6 average-quality mini-games enforced by quota. I mean how many times have you played each of the mini-games that [i]Poly[/i] puts out? Is it a one-shot? Twice? I can tell you, that among the mini-games produced so far, I find only one that is worth playing over and over again. Maybe because it caters to my own personal preference as well as my group's. As for supporting [i]d20,[/i] Wizards is as much a part of the community as the rest of the [i]d20[/i] publishers, or do you deny the other non-[i]D&D[/i] games? [i]Poly[/i] is still trying to find its niche, despite complaints from [i]D&D[/i] Purists (or is it Supremacists?), as well as expand their readership. While you may like the previous format, their accounting ledger shows it did not do to expand the sales of the magazine. [/QUOTE]

Verification