Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Ace" data-source="post: 390983" data-attributes="member: 944">I understand where you are coming from. 3e must be uncomfortable for you in many ways. I mean shoot your post your character stats in 1e/2e formatPersonaly I like the flexibility (pun intended) of the new rules myself and hate the boring archetypes.Heck many of the great non chivalric characters in Fantasy&nbsp; literature were multi classed in D&amp;D terms, Conan-- Fighter/Rogue/Barbarian,&nbsp;&nbsp; Aragorn Ranger/Paladin (JMO) Grey Mouser&nbsp; Fighter/Rogue/Mage, Sparhawk (from the Ellenium) Pandion Knight, Rogue (a few levels) and Spellcaster of some kind&nbsp; even Vlad (from Jehereg) Rogue/Witch (ritual psion)/Sorcerer/Assassin and Vanyel (from last Herald mage stuff by Mercedes Lackey) Fighter/Mage&nbsp;D&amp;D3e lets me make people not sterotypes. Now On Topic, JMO but the restrictions are foolish I rule zero'd themGoing farther&nbsp; I only require Paladins to be good aligned not just Lawful Good. It makes for more variety IMO,YMMV all that</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Ace, post: 390983, member: 944"] I understand where you are coming from. 3e must be uncomfortable for you in many ways. I mean shoot your post your character stats in 1e/2e format Personaly I like the flexibility (pun intended) of the new rules myself and hate the boring archetypes. Heck many of the great non chivalric characters in Fantasy literature were multi classed in D&D terms, Conan-- Fighter/Rogue/Barbarian, Aragorn Ranger/Paladin (JMO) Grey Mouser Fighter/Rogue/Mage, Sparhawk (from the Ellenium) Pandion Knight, Rogue (a few levels) and Spellcaster of some kind even Vlad (from Jehereg) Rogue/Witch (ritual psion)/Sorcerer/Assassin and Vanyel (from last Herald mage stuff by Mercedes Lackey) Fighter/Mage D&D3e lets me make people not sterotypes. Now On Topic, JMO but the restrictions are foolish I rule zero'd them Going farther I only require Paladins to be good aligned not just Lawful Good. It makes for more variety IMO,YMMV all that [/QUOTE]

Verification