Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Cyronax" data-source="post: 4656307" data-attributes="member: 822">One of the main points that was in contention here (whehter or not it was part of a misunderstanding) was still the amount of divine intervention at hand in a campaign. If a DM doesn't want his game to turn into a Baldur's Gate II: Throne of Bhaal style game (at even a minimal level), that shoule be his perogative. The DM still has to enjoy the game too. All to often the 'player's always right' crowd on these boards can forget that part too. If the DM just doesn't allow something despite doing his/her best to accommodate some type of compromise, then I either adapt or I leave and find a new campaign. And I say this as a player who has periodically tried to play an anesiac power-downed immortal type character and at one instance a 'plaything of the gods' similar to Jason (of the Argonauts). And most cases the DM at the time asked me to prune back the story slightly or completely C.I.D.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Cyronax, post: 4656307, member: 822"] One of the main points that was in contention here (whehter or not it was part of a misunderstanding) was still the amount of divine intervention at hand in a campaign. If a DM doesn't want his game to turn into a Baldur's Gate II: Throne of Bhaal style game (at even a minimal level), that shoule be his perogative. The DM still has to enjoy the game too. All to often the 'player's always right' crowd on these boards can forget that part too. If the DM just doesn't allow something despite doing his/her best to accommodate some type of compromise, then I either adapt or I leave and find a new campaign. And I say this as a player who has periodically tried to play an anesiac power-downed immortal type character and at one instance a 'plaything of the gods' similar to Jason (of the Argonauts). And most cases the DM at the time asked me to prune back the story slightly or completely C.I.D. [/QUOTE]

Verification