Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
[Rant] is D&D going the way of the CCG?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="shadow" data-source="post: 655488" data-attributes="member: 2182"><p>This quote from the Revised D&D FAQ really concerns me. Although the official word is that the revisions will improve the game, the fact is that Wizards is just trying to milk more money out of us. What really concerns me though is the quote about D&D being a "living game", which essentially means that we'll see a new revision, or at least rule changes every so often which will invalidate older books. Methinks that Wizards is applying the same marketing strategy that made Magic (*shudder*) to D&D. Think about it, every so often Wizards releases a new expansion set of Magic cards which introduces new rules. At the same time they declare older cards invalid. At one time I was a victim of card crack, too. However, I was surprised to learn the large majority of the magic cards that I own from my Magic days are no longer considered legal. In the same vein Wizards is releasing a new edition of D&D in less than four years after the release of 3e. All the 3e stuff that I brought is no longer official after the release of 3.5e. Sure Wizards talks about "backward compatibility" but what does it really mean? Fixing spell like Harm/Haste with errata would be one thing, but screwing around with the classes is really going to change the game. All the NPCs of the all the previous books were built with the original rules, not 3.5e rules. Also the challenge ratings of the encounters in all the previous books were determined using the power of the original classes. I see a "butterfly effect" happening here. Little changes are going to make a big difference in the game.</p><p>Although I don't "have" buy the revised books, a new books and modules are going to be based on the new rules, meaning that if I want to use anything published after the 3.5 is released I'm going to have to buy the revised rule books.</p><p></p><p>Besides, even after they revise the rules how are we going to know that they aren't going to revise them further? No set of rules is going to please every player, especially with such a diverse audience as D&D players (you just have to read the boards to see the differences in opinions regarding how the rules should be built to see this diversity). Just as Wizards continually updates Magic and constantly revises the rules, Wizards is bound to update D&D again before long since it's a "living game". Although 3e isn't perfect it's far better than any previous edition. If it ain't broke, don't fix it!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="shadow, post: 655488, member: 2182"] This quote from the Revised D&D FAQ really concerns me. Although the official word is that the revisions will improve the game, the fact is that Wizards is just trying to milk more money out of us. What really concerns me though is the quote about D&D being a "living game", which essentially means that we'll see a new revision, or at least rule changes every so often which will invalidate older books. Methinks that Wizards is applying the same marketing strategy that made Magic (*shudder*) to D&D. Think about it, every so often Wizards releases a new expansion set of Magic cards which introduces new rules. At the same time they declare older cards invalid. At one time I was a victim of card crack, too. However, I was surprised to learn the large majority of the magic cards that I own from my Magic days are no longer considered legal. In the same vein Wizards is releasing a new edition of D&D in less than four years after the release of 3e. All the 3e stuff that I brought is no longer official after the release of 3.5e. Sure Wizards talks about "backward compatibility" but what does it really mean? Fixing spell like Harm/Haste with errata would be one thing, but screwing around with the classes is really going to change the game. All the NPCs of the all the previous books were built with the original rules, not 3.5e rules. Also the challenge ratings of the encounters in all the previous books were determined using the power of the original classes. I see a "butterfly effect" happening here. Little changes are going to make a big difference in the game. Although I don't "have" buy the revised books, a new books and modules are going to be based on the new rules, meaning that if I want to use anything published after the 3.5 is released I'm going to have to buy the revised rule books. Besides, even after they revise the rules how are we going to know that they aren't going to revise them further? No set of rules is going to please every player, especially with such a diverse audience as D&D players (you just have to read the boards to see the differences in opinions regarding how the rules should be built to see this diversity). Just as Wizards continually updates Magic and constantly revises the rules, Wizards is bound to update D&D again before long since it's a "living game". Although 3e isn't perfect it's far better than any previous edition. If it ain't broke, don't fix it! [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
[Rant] is D&D going the way of the CCG?
Top