Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Rant on Errata and what Wizards need to do to move forward.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="MrMyth" data-source="post: 5506188" data-attributes="member: 61155"><p>I agree with that. I think it would be awesome if they had more money diverted to their digital division, and were able to rebuild their approach from the ground up with digital products in mind. But I also don't think it is easy to just make happen, especially with the expenses lost on the original DDI contract work - basically, I don't think Hasbro is willing to invest the resources needed to fully reinvent their business process. I don't think it is paranoia alone that is getting in the way. </p><p> </p><p></p><p> </p><p>Hopefully, yeah. But like I said - these sorts of errors have shown up throughout the history of the game. They aren't something new. Ignoring them instead of fixing them - as happened in 3.0/3.5 - isn't an approach I'm a fan of. </p><p> </p><p>I agree that avoiding them entirely is the ideal. And there are definitely elements I see that I shake my head at and wonder how they got through. But some will always creep in there, and better for them to fix them than to not do so. </p><p> </p><p></p><p> </p><p>These seem two different goals. Whether you have a digital copy or not, errata will still happen if stuff needs fixing. If your concern is that you just want an easy digital reminder of what changes have happened... isn't that what we have?</p><p> </p><p></p><p> </p><p>Actually, I think they have closed the minis line because they weren't making a profit, even after reinventing the line several times to try and find something that worked. </p><p> </p><p>The board games have been a huge success, from what I understand. And I'm not sure why you see it as random - board games are something existing gamers can enjoy, but also something that can bring in new gamers. That's exactly the sort of product that is great for the game in the long run. </p><p> </p><p>Accessories and such are nice, but I don't think there is as much a market for them as you believe. </p><p> </p><p></p><p> </p><p>The majority of those reasons involve the roll-out of the product, the poor communication involved, and the numerous bugs at the time of release. Most of those bugs have been addressed. More additions are still needed - more character sheets, more customization, for example - but what is there is no longer nonfunctional like it was at launch. </p><p> </p><p>I believe <a href="http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/26183949/Open_Letter_to_WotC" target="_blank">this</a> is the thread you were referring to. Yes, many complaints about the online character builder. The majority of which are from months ago, when it was launched. Dannager is calling in slick based on <em>what it is capable of right now</em> - and a thread of complaints about the buggy version from 5 months ago really isn't all that relevant.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="MrMyth, post: 5506188, member: 61155"] I agree with that. I think it would be awesome if they had more money diverted to their digital division, and were able to rebuild their approach from the ground up with digital products in mind. But I also don't think it is easy to just make happen, especially with the expenses lost on the original DDI contract work - basically, I don't think Hasbro is willing to invest the resources needed to fully reinvent their business process. I don't think it is paranoia alone that is getting in the way. Hopefully, yeah. But like I said - these sorts of errors have shown up throughout the history of the game. They aren't something new. Ignoring them instead of fixing them - as happened in 3.0/3.5 - isn't an approach I'm a fan of. I agree that avoiding them entirely is the ideal. And there are definitely elements I see that I shake my head at and wonder how they got through. But some will always creep in there, and better for them to fix them than to not do so. These seem two different goals. Whether you have a digital copy or not, errata will still happen if stuff needs fixing. If your concern is that you just want an easy digital reminder of what changes have happened... isn't that what we have? Actually, I think they have closed the minis line because they weren't making a profit, even after reinventing the line several times to try and find something that worked. The board games have been a huge success, from what I understand. And I'm not sure why you see it as random - board games are something existing gamers can enjoy, but also something that can bring in new gamers. That's exactly the sort of product that is great for the game in the long run. Accessories and such are nice, but I don't think there is as much a market for them as you believe. The majority of those reasons involve the roll-out of the product, the poor communication involved, and the numerous bugs at the time of release. Most of those bugs have been addressed. More additions are still needed - more character sheets, more customization, for example - but what is there is no longer nonfunctional like it was at launch. I believe [URL="http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/26183949/Open_Letter_to_WotC"]this[/URL] is the thread you were referring to. Yes, many complaints about the online character builder. The majority of which are from months ago, when it was launched. Dannager is calling in slick based on [I]what it is capable of right now[/I] - and a thread of complaints about the buggy version from 5 months ago really isn't all that relevant. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Rant on Errata and what Wizards need to do to move forward.
Top