Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Rant on Errata and what Wizards need to do to move forward.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="MrMyth" data-source="post: 5507105" data-attributes="member: 61155"><p>As noted - this requires a lot more time and effort on each product. So, are you suggesting they increase the cost of each book? </p><p> </p><p></p><p> </p><p>The online CB was released several months ago, and is getting better all the time. Do you honestly believe they aren't <em>trying </em>to improve the current programs into an effective product? Or do you truly believe they can magically pull a single perfect program out of thin air?</p><p> </p><p>Creating what you are looking for <em>is precisely what they are trying to do</em>.</p><p> </p><p>And, once again, many of the complaints about the CB have already been addressed. Sure, the core issues - like being an online program - aren't changing, but that doesn't have much to do with how effective the program itself actually is. </p><p> </p><p>What <em>new </em>threads have you been reading that talk about <em>current </em>problems with the CB?</p><p> </p><p></p><p> </p><p>On the one hand, you point to threads about the CB's problems in order to argue against those who actually <em>use </em>the CB. But you appear to have missed the many threads demonstrating how impressed folks are with the board games. They have been pointed out as one of WotC's big successes of the last year. </p><p> </p><p>Even many who are not fans of 4E have said they find them worthwhile purchases. And it is true we can't tell for sure how good the sales are, but the fact that WotC is lining up several more such products seems promising. </p><p> </p><p></p><p> </p><p>Well, not us. But also... not you. </p><p> </p><p>And it doesn't really require exact numbers to know that what you are asking for would largely involve a lot more investment of resources. Months of extra testing for each book to make sure the content is <em>perfect</em>? Developing instantaneously a perfect digital program for the game, and reworking their entire system process for content distribution?</p><p> </p><p>All of that takes time and money. And while your proposed system might offer some nice new features for the customers, it doesn't seem likely to do the same for WotC itself. </p><p> </p><p>I'm not saying there aren't good ideas scattered amongst your suggestions. But making this sort of thing happen is just not that simple. It isn't just a matter of wanting it to be so, and it happening. And without acknowledging that, most folks are, yes, going to dismiss your points right off the bat.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="MrMyth, post: 5507105, member: 61155"] As noted - this requires a lot more time and effort on each product. So, are you suggesting they increase the cost of each book? The online CB was released several months ago, and is getting better all the time. Do you honestly believe they aren't [I]trying [/I]to improve the current programs into an effective product? Or do you truly believe they can magically pull a single perfect program out of thin air? Creating what you are looking for [I]is precisely what they are trying to do[/I]. And, once again, many of the complaints about the CB have already been addressed. Sure, the core issues - like being an online program - aren't changing, but that doesn't have much to do with how effective the program itself actually is. What [I]new [/I]threads have you been reading that talk about [I]current [/I]problems with the CB? On the one hand, you point to threads about the CB's problems in order to argue against those who actually [I]use [/I]the CB. But you appear to have missed the many threads demonstrating how impressed folks are with the board games. They have been pointed out as one of WotC's big successes of the last year. Even many who are not fans of 4E have said they find them worthwhile purchases. And it is true we can't tell for sure how good the sales are, but the fact that WotC is lining up several more such products seems promising. Well, not us. But also... not you. And it doesn't really require exact numbers to know that what you are asking for would largely involve a lot more investment of resources. Months of extra testing for each book to make sure the content is [I]perfect[/I]? Developing instantaneously a perfect digital program for the game, and reworking their entire system process for content distribution? All of that takes time and money. And while your proposed system might offer some nice new features for the customers, it doesn't seem likely to do the same for WotC itself. I'm not saying there aren't good ideas scattered amongst your suggestions. But making this sort of thing happen is just not that simple. It isn't just a matter of wanting it to be so, and it happening. And without acknowledging that, most folks are, yes, going to dismiss your points right off the bat. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Rant on Errata and what Wizards need to do to move forward.
Top