Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Zogg" data-source="post: 965498" data-attributes="member: 12133">Now we are getting into an entirely different argument. This boils down to "what is 3.5E"? Is it:1. A revision of core rules based on what was broken in the core rules. 2. A revision of core rules based on what was broken in the third-party supplementsor 3. Some combination therein.?I don't think it's ever really been clear - and spell focus lies at the heart of the matter. I would hope that 3.5E is based entirely on #1. And so the point I am making is that when making core rules, one should strive to make them the best core rules possible and yes, ignore all third party supplements. If a third-party supplement gives barbarians a "super duper rage" ability that gives a +10 to STR and CON that does not make the core rules bad, it makes the third party supplement bad. The same goes with GSF - apparently too many people think it's overpowered. That does not mean the designers should reduce what is fair - the designers should not that Spell Focus to a particular school is IT - no further "focus" can be stacked on top. Talk about a no-brainer.</blockquote>