Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Mark" data-source="post: 965521" data-attributes="member: 5">When I know it is going to rain, and I do not wish to get wet, I bring an umbrella.Zogg and Dimwhit - You seem to be comtinuing to ignore the crux of my point.  There *will* be supplemental material, both from WotC and from third-party pubs.  Designing the revised rules with the foresight that this will come to pass, IMO, is the no-brainer.The designers have apparently already decided that SF needed a change, I guess the question was in which way would it *be* changed.  One feat with +2 and no subsequent feat...or...two feats at +1 each, one being subsequent to the other.The first way ignores any possible proliferation (which we *know* will happen through WotC and others)... or ... the first way promotes the idea that any subsequent additions should happen in +2 increments.  The second way is smart enough to take proliferation into account, is it not?</blockquote>