Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="ThirdWizard" data-source="post: 3847356" data-attributes="member: 12037">Oh, that had already been addressed so I thought we were going more general now.But, here are the things that were said: 4e in the works, more miniature-centric, with a collectible aspect. A high up in WotC then emailed Eric saying that this information was way off the mark. This is how it appeared to me.And, now that we've seen the direction of 4e, we know this is true. It was way off the mark! Sure, they were working on 4e. That's never really been a secret, though, as Monte Cook stated that they've always been working on 4e. The question becomes how far along was the 4e development. And, this was over a year ago. A year! And, things seem to indicate that the announcement was made about 6 months earlier than expected, so especially in August of last year, 4e speculation of an imminent announcement was way off.So... I don't see where the lying could possibly be.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="ThirdWizard, post: 3847356, member: 12037"] Oh, that had already been addressed so I thought we were going more general now. But, here are the things that were said: 4e in the works, more miniature-centric, with a collectible aspect. A high up in WotC then emailed Eric saying that this information was way off the mark. This is how it appeared to me. And, now that we've seen the direction of 4e, we know this is true. [i]It was way off the mark![/i] Sure, they were working on 4e. That's never really been a secret, though, as Monte Cook stated that they've always been working on 4e. The question becomes how far along was the 4e development. And, this was over a year ago. A year! And, things seem to indicate that the announcement was made about 6 months earlier than expected, so especially in August of last year, 4e speculation of an imminent announcement was way off. So... I don't see where the lying could possibly be. [/QUOTE]

Verification