Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
[Rant] Screw Canon!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Shemeska" data-source="post: 2440090" data-attributes="member: 11697"><p>At least in my mind there's a difference (if at times a tenuous one) between Orcus/Tenebrous and the details surrounding him versus the rather bland and flavorless lichfiend template. Orcus/Tenebrous was some unique undead being, really a fluke of nature and not some standard occurance by any measure. The Visages that Pants cited before are also his creations during that period.</p><p></p><p>I don't have a big problem with undead fiends, but for a variety of reasons they don't make sense outside of being the products of rare and unique circumstances. Lich fiends make little sense as the fiend's soul and body are the exact same thing with no duality present between the two. How is it going to have a phylactery holding its soul if there isn't one seperate from its body? Secondly, what's the rationale for a fiend to become a lich? It's already immortal, and let's face it, escaping death from old age is the primary reason liches become what they are, it's a product of a mortal's fear of death. A fiend doesn't have that, and they all believe in the utter supremacy of their alignment, and the perfection of their state of being. A lich fiend makes little sense in those ways; it seems silly more than a cool idea.</p><p></p><p>The approach taken with the 'lichfiend' was less a unique and cool new idea, and more a seeming case of 'undead are evil and kewl. Fiends are evil and kewl. An undead fiend would just be uber kewl then!'. Outside of some bizarre circumstance, which I can't immediately rationalize, it just seems forced and awkward.</p><p></p><p>Undead elementals are similar, though the ones presented in Libris Mortis are effectively just the negative touched quasielementals given a name change and a different conceptualization. Had they called them negative quasielementals and talked about the nature of those elementals and their relation to negative energy it would have been cool and internally consistant w/ the lore on elementals and negative energy etc. Instead we got something that again seemed forced and ill conceived, though heavily derived from those previous creatures, just lacking the explanations that made them seem plausible.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Shemeska, post: 2440090, member: 11697"] At least in my mind there's a difference (if at times a tenuous one) between Orcus/Tenebrous and the details surrounding him versus the rather bland and flavorless lichfiend template. Orcus/Tenebrous was some unique undead being, really a fluke of nature and not some standard occurance by any measure. The Visages that Pants cited before are also his creations during that period. I don't have a big problem with undead fiends, but for a variety of reasons they don't make sense outside of being the products of rare and unique circumstances. Lich fiends make little sense as the fiend's soul and body are the exact same thing with no duality present between the two. How is it going to have a phylactery holding its soul if there isn't one seperate from its body? Secondly, what's the rationale for a fiend to become a lich? It's already immortal, and let's face it, escaping death from old age is the primary reason liches become what they are, it's a product of a mortal's fear of death. A fiend doesn't have that, and they all believe in the utter supremacy of their alignment, and the perfection of their state of being. A lich fiend makes little sense in those ways; it seems silly more than a cool idea. The approach taken with the 'lichfiend' was less a unique and cool new idea, and more a seeming case of 'undead are evil and kewl. Fiends are evil and kewl. An undead fiend would just be uber kewl then!'. Outside of some bizarre circumstance, which I can't immediately rationalize, it just seems forced and awkward. Undead elementals are similar, though the ones presented in Libris Mortis are effectively just the negative touched quasielementals given a name change and a different conceptualization. Had they called them negative quasielementals and talked about the nature of those elementals and their relation to negative energy it would have been cool and internally consistant w/ the lore on elementals and negative energy etc. Instead we got something that again seemed forced and ill conceived, though heavily derived from those previous creatures, just lacking the explanations that made them seem plausible. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
[Rant] Screw Canon!
Top