Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="DiFier" data-source="post: 1662938" data-attributes="member: 2345">Good Question. Monster Manual Only?I guess I'm lucky I've never played with a standard party.  my first 3.0 experience was with a teifling sorcerer/rogue, a overweight elven (disguised as a young human) chef (read rogue) a Sadistic Human Cleric and a Human Bard who had a thing for elven women.  that game fell apart cause 2 of the players decided to try to out sneaky each other.  (taking treasure for themselves)  and sorta tried to out evil each other too.  my second group (which we are still playing but are giving the DM a break while the other player runs a game) is just two characters a rogue/fighter/wizard slayer who is a crime lord and a fighter/wizard/spellsword who is a noble and both of which are former members of the Freeport city watch.  this isn't an evil campaign even if on of the main characters is a crime lord.We also played a lower level three shot game in the same world playing evil PCs when a friend visited for a little bit over Christmas.  Evil might be a little strong.  Lets call us morally ambiguous.  It took place in Freeport too.  that had a straight rogue (con artist) a bard/(non-core core class that made him a sweet talker) who was also a con artist and a Neutral Cleric of trickery and the sea who's job was to relieve other (people, churches, cities, countries) of magic items that were precious to the god of the sea. That went rather well for 3 morally ambiguous, non regular role, characters. really well infact.</blockquote>

Verification