Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Thomas Shey" data-source="post: 9676246" data-attributes="member: 7026617"><p>To make it clear, I don't object to any of these in principal either; the problem (as I see it, and it seems to be many players  do) is that your Failure with Complication and Success with Complication takes up too much of the probability space in PbtA, compounded by its active avoidance of any simple failure space at all.  There are other ways to do Fail Forward; the simple way is to replace Failure with Limited Success and not feel the obligation to take on extra problems in every case that isn't a full success.  But as I've noted, at least the general run of PbtA considers additional Complications most of the point, so that's not what it does.  The fact it consists of 2D6 rolls with a limited probability space present because of that doesn't help from many people's point of view.</p></blockquote><p></p>