Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
[rant]The conservatism of D&D fans is exhausting.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="EzekielRaiden" data-source="post: 9679225" data-attributes="member: 6790260"><p>Just wanted to note that this is an example of something I consider to be <em>perfectly legitimate</em> use of "common sense" and "[GM's] instinct"--not because it's about <em>drama</em>, but because there are guidelines. The rules specify the context and appropriate ranges; the GM is expected to use these judiciously, because the books can't do that part. They can furnish you with the tools to make those decisions <em>easier</em>, and to ensure that the impact of those decisions is <em>worthwhile</em> to the players. But they can't actually make the decision on your behalf, and do not try to do so.</p><p></p><p>I, as a player, can see and know the same rules and limits, the same <em>structure</em>, that the GM does. That means I actually have the ability to understand what processes are involved, what kinds of choices are being made in a given context. That means I can decide <em>for myself</em> whether the GM's judgment is judicious or not, whether or not their common sense is in fact common between us and actually sensible. I'm not dependent on trying to read someone's mind when they're making decisions inside the black box that they won't describe to me (and that I would not <em>want</em> them to describe to me in that context, to be clear!)</p><p></p><p>This is strongly related to my...intense...negative reaction to the suggestion that players should have all of the rules hidden away from them, so that they are <em>wholly</em> dependent on the GM telling them what they can or cannot do, what is or is not possible, etc., etc., without <em>any</em> means, whatsoever, of knowing what is happening within the rules. I find that particular concept...let's just say "off-putting" would be the understatement of the decade.</p><p></p><p>Players knowing the frameworks in which decisions are made, understanding where the boundaries lie, is quite important. Hence why I have a rather dim view of the idea (I don't <em>think</em> Gygax said this one?) that you should forbid players from playing in your game if they've read the DMG.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="EzekielRaiden, post: 9679225, member: 6790260"] Just wanted to note that this is an example of something I consider to be [I]perfectly legitimate[/I] use of "common sense" and "[GM's] instinct"--not because it's about [I]drama[/I], but because there are guidelines. The rules specify the context and appropriate ranges; the GM is expected to use these judiciously, because the books can't do that part. They can furnish you with the tools to make those decisions [I]easier[/I], and to ensure that the impact of those decisions is [I]worthwhile[/I] to the players. But they can't actually make the decision on your behalf, and do not try to do so. I, as a player, can see and know the same rules and limits, the same [I]structure[/I], that the GM does. That means I actually have the ability to understand what processes are involved, what kinds of choices are being made in a given context. That means I can decide [I]for myself[/I] whether the GM's judgment is judicious or not, whether or not their common sense is in fact common between us and actually sensible. I'm not dependent on trying to read someone's mind when they're making decisions inside the black box that they won't describe to me (and that I would not [I]want[/I] them to describe to me in that context, to be clear!) This is strongly related to my...intense...negative reaction to the suggestion that players should have all of the rules hidden away from them, so that they are [I]wholly[/I] dependent on the GM telling them what they can or cannot do, what is or is not possible, etc., etc., without [I]any[/I] means, whatsoever, of knowing what is happening within the rules. I find that particular concept...let's just say "off-putting" would be the understatement of the decade. Players knowing the frameworks in which decisions are made, understanding where the boundaries lie, is quite important. Hence why I have a rather dim view of the idea (I don't [I]think[/I] Gygax said this one?) that you should forbid players from playing in your game if they've read the DMG. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
[rant]The conservatism of D&D fans is exhausting.
Top