Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
[rant]The conservatism of D&D fans is exhausting.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="pemerton" data-source="post: 9713582" data-attributes="member: 42582"><p>Yes, I know. The structure of your play includes the GM using secret information to establish secret fictional positioning which is then used to resolve declared actions that involve <em>looking</em>, <em>searching</em>, <em>wondering</em>, etc - what one could very broadly call actions of "knowing" or "learning" about the PC's surroundings.</p><p></p><p>We could talk about how those sorts of actions are declared and resolved across a range of other systems - eg how Wises work in Burning Wheel; how reading strange runes (which have been established as a scene distinction) works in MHRP/Cortex+ Heroic; how I resolved the Insight check in 4e D&D that I posted about not too far upthread; how the GM of Dogs in the Vineyard actively reveals the town in play - but that would require looking at other structures of play beyond mainstream/conventional D&D.</p><p></p><p>This example suggests a few things to me:</p><p></p><p>(1) A focus on character wealth as a type of "victory" marker;</p><p></p><p>(2) A lack of attention to the framework for declaring and resolving actions.</p><p></p><p>I mean, it looks like it's supposed to be a "gotcha", about how the game will break (and similar posts were made upthread in response to the runes example, and over the years as well as 1,000,000 gp I've seen holy swords and other D&D-esque goodies). But as I already posted, in the same game as the strange runes the rune-reading PC succeeded in a roll to establish, as an asset, the dark elves' stash of faerie gold, which he ran away with, leaving the other PCs stuck in a fight at the bottom of the dungeon. The action declaration wasn't ridiculous, and its resolution didn't break the game.</p><p></p><p>And to bring this back to "simulationism": why is what I've just described not simulationist? The game participants had a conception of the dark elves at the bottom of the dungeon, Vault of the Drow style. That conception was explored and developed; one of the participants introduced as part of that the idea of them having a stash of gold; and then the game system allowed that idea to be given concrete form in play. That is "heightened appreciation" of a subject matter. (As per [USER=71699]@clearstream[/USER]'s conception of simulation in RPGing.)</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="pemerton, post: 9713582, member: 42582"] Yes, I know. The structure of your play includes the GM using secret information to establish secret fictional positioning which is then used to resolve declared actions that involve [I]looking[/I], [I]searching[/I], [I]wondering[/I], etc - what one could very broadly call actions of "knowing" or "learning" about the PC's surroundings. We could talk about how those sorts of actions are declared and resolved across a range of other systems - eg how Wises work in Burning Wheel; how reading strange runes (which have been established as a scene distinction) works in MHRP/Cortex+ Heroic; how I resolved the Insight check in 4e D&D that I posted about not too far upthread; how the GM of Dogs in the Vineyard actively reveals the town in play - but that would require looking at other structures of play beyond mainstream/conventional D&D. This example suggests a few things to me: (1) A focus on character wealth as a type of "victory" marker; (2) A lack of attention to the framework for declaring and resolving actions. I mean, it looks like it's supposed to be a "gotcha", about how the game will break (and similar posts were made upthread in response to the runes example, and over the years as well as 1,000,000 gp I've seen holy swords and other D&D-esque goodies). But as I already posted, in the same game as the strange runes the rune-reading PC succeeded in a roll to establish, as an asset, the dark elves' stash of faerie gold, which he ran away with, leaving the other PCs stuck in a fight at the bottom of the dungeon. The action declaration wasn't ridiculous, and its resolution didn't break the game. And to bring this back to "simulationism": why is what I've just described not simulationist? The game participants had a conception of the dark elves at the bottom of the dungeon, Vault of the Drow style. That conception was explored and developed; one of the participants introduced as part of that the idea of them having a stash of gold; and then the game system allowed that idea to be given concrete form in play. That is "heightened appreciation" of a subject matter. (As per [USER=71699]@clearstream[/USER]'s conception of simulation in RPGing.) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
[rant]The conservatism of D&D fans is exhausting.
Top