Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
[rant]The conservatism of D&D fans is exhausting.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Maxperson" data-source="post: 9721848" data-attributes="member: 23751"><p>That's linear, but not a railroad. When I walk through a path in the woods, I usually opt to stay on it, even though I could step off any time I want. </p><p></p><p>The DM there has asked nicely for the players to stick to the adventure, but it is not required. If the players agree and stay on the path, that's their decision, not the DM's. They could leave the path if they wanted and the DM would have to improvise or call it a night.</p><p></p><p>Really? You think if you walk into a traditional game expecting to have a bunch of player facing ability to affect the fiction as a player you are being railroaded? You aren't. You have no right to agree to a traditional game and expect anything other than a traditional sort of game. Any feelings of being railroaded are on you. You aren't being railroaded, though.</p><p></p><p>No. You just shouldn't play in a game where you aren't happy. Agreeing to play in such a game, though, and then being unhappy with it being run as that sort of game, doesn't make you railroaded, no matter how unhappy you are with it.</p><p></p><p>If I agree to a mud run, I don't get to say that they railroaded me into getting all muddy. If I don't want to get muddy, then I won't agree to a mud run. To date I've never been on one and I doubt I ever will. Mud isn't my thing.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Maxperson, post: 9721848, member: 23751"] That's linear, but not a railroad. When I walk through a path in the woods, I usually opt to stay on it, even though I could step off any time I want. The DM there has asked nicely for the players to stick to the adventure, but it is not required. If the players agree and stay on the path, that's their decision, not the DM's. They could leave the path if they wanted and the DM would have to improvise or call it a night. Really? You think if you walk into a traditional game expecting to have a bunch of player facing ability to affect the fiction as a player you are being railroaded? You aren't. You have no right to agree to a traditional game and expect anything other than a traditional sort of game. Any feelings of being railroaded are on you. You aren't being railroaded, though. No. You just shouldn't play in a game where you aren't happy. Agreeing to play in such a game, though, and then being unhappy with it being run as that sort of game, doesn't make you railroaded, no matter how unhappy you are with it. If I agree to a mud run, I don't get to say that they railroaded me into getting all muddy. If I don't want to get muddy, then I won't agree to a mud run. To date I've never been on one and I doubt I ever will. Mud isn't my thing. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
[rant]The conservatism of D&D fans is exhausting.
Top