Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Rant: Why must thing always be obvious in D&D?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="I'm A Banana" data-source="post: 3654468" data-attributes="member: 2067"><p>There ya go!</p><p></p><p>It's important, in my mind, that the DM makes the player's choices fun. Once you've said "okay!" to a dark cleric of secrets and evil, it's your job, as a DM, to present them with challenges and give them appropriate rewards. You should give them secrets to keep, dark rites to participate in, good-guys they can kill, shadows they find security in, etc., etc., etc. There should be challenges that reflect his nature: he SHOULD have to risk a town finding out about him, a wanna-be hero chasing him down, rival cultists wanting to reveal his secrets, etc. And he SHOULD have to face these down.</p><p></p><p>If you're throwing a roadblock at a character whenever he just wants to chat with some of his peers, though, you've kind of boned the character for his character choice. You've made it "not fun" to play the character, because that character experiences some special disadvantage that is in no way compensated for. </p><p></p><p>It would be similar to saying "Yes, you can be an elven sorcerer! But magic is rare and secretive!" and then making the character deal with not having a spellbook, familiar, or component pouch because "there's no way he could have attained these when magic is rare and secretive!" </p><p></p><p>Or allowing a thieving rogue who then is automatically hunted and who has wanted posters on every inn and who can't go into any town for fear of being apprehended.</p><p></p><p>You've effectively made it more difficult to play that kind of character in your setting. You've <em>unbalanced</em> things, as surely as if you let a level 3 commoner adventure with level 15 paladins. While many players might not mind playing in an unbalanced party, it should hardly be expected to be the *norm.*</p><p></p><p>This assumes, reasonably, that the equipment and aid were more along the lines of "visiting town to rest and resupply" than something special and significant. Equipment and aid generally are relatively minor, assured things for a character to have, but if the setting is especially tough or gritty, I suppose they might not be, and asking for such things would be a great reward.</p><p></p><p>Basically, you shouldn't put roadblocks to any character you've accepted for their basic operation and requirements unless doing so is part of a grander scheme that the player can then thwart. Like taking away a Wizard's component pouch, it's a harsh tactic for a DM to take, one that, for many players, really hurts their ability to enjoy the character.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="I'm A Banana, post: 3654468, member: 2067"] There ya go! It's important, in my mind, that the DM makes the player's choices fun. Once you've said "okay!" to a dark cleric of secrets and evil, it's your job, as a DM, to present them with challenges and give them appropriate rewards. You should give them secrets to keep, dark rites to participate in, good-guys they can kill, shadows they find security in, etc., etc., etc. There should be challenges that reflect his nature: he SHOULD have to risk a town finding out about him, a wanna-be hero chasing him down, rival cultists wanting to reveal his secrets, etc. And he SHOULD have to face these down. If you're throwing a roadblock at a character whenever he just wants to chat with some of his peers, though, you've kind of boned the character for his character choice. You've made it "not fun" to play the character, because that character experiences some special disadvantage that is in no way compensated for. It would be similar to saying "Yes, you can be an elven sorcerer! But magic is rare and secretive!" and then making the character deal with not having a spellbook, familiar, or component pouch because "there's no way he could have attained these when magic is rare and secretive!" Or allowing a thieving rogue who then is automatically hunted and who has wanted posters on every inn and who can't go into any town for fear of being apprehended. You've effectively made it more difficult to play that kind of character in your setting. You've [I]unbalanced[/I] things, as surely as if you let a level 3 commoner adventure with level 15 paladins. While many players might not mind playing in an unbalanced party, it should hardly be expected to be the *norm.* This assumes, reasonably, that the equipment and aid were more along the lines of "visiting town to rest and resupply" than something special and significant. Equipment and aid generally are relatively minor, assured things for a character to have, but if the setting is especially tough or gritty, I suppose they might not be, and asking for such things would be a great reward. Basically, you shouldn't put roadblocks to any character you've accepted for their basic operation and requirements unless doing so is part of a grander scheme that the player can then thwart. Like taking away a Wizard's component pouch, it's a harsh tactic for a DM to take, one that, for many players, really hurts their ability to enjoy the character. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Rant: Why must thing always be obvious in D&D?
Top