Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Enchanted Trinkets Complete--a hardcover book containing over 500 magic items for your D&D games!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Rate Constantine
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="The Serge" data-source="post: 2049482" data-attributes="member: 4049"><p>I saw this on Friday. </p><p></p><p>I usually walk out of every movie I've seen with a very firm perspective that changes little after the first viewing. This is the first time in a long time I walked out without a strong opinion and not sure if I liked it or hated it. I suppose from that perspective, I'd give it a C, but I don't know that that's fair.</p><p></p><p>I have read quite a few of the <em>Hellblazer</em> series upon which this material's based. However, I expect adaptations to capture the spirit and feel of the original source if not the precise story line, so I rarely walk into a film adaptation expecting whole sale accuracy. Some adaptations, like <em>X-Men</em> and the original <em>Superman</em>, characters with whom I'm very familiar, work out just fine despite variations on the theme. Others, like most of the <em>Batman</em> franchise to date, fail miserably. In <em>Constantine</em>, they managed to capture most of the visuals and concepts associated with DC's Vertigo stories (and, to a lesser extent, "mainstream" comics like the third series <em>The Spectre</em>). Indeed, there were at least three different storylines from the series that were used in this film (the entire portion with Lucifer is taken from one of the best story arcs in the series).</p><p></p><p>That said, I really don't know how well all of this was pulled off. I mean, the story meandered quite a bit and there's a lot of talk with strange, sudden moments of action. Frankly, I think a good 30 minutes could have been edited out of this. Secondly, while much of the FX were cool, some of it was lacking. The "soldier demons," for example, were interesting to look the first time... After that, not so much. In fact, considering the wealth of demonic images in this, I would have expected a more impressive variation on the demonic themes. I mean, Balthazar could have been like some kind of "Beelzebub" while we could have seen another demon that resembled a pit fiend. Lucifer himself was a particular letdown considering that he's supposed to be the most beautiful of all God's creations in Catholic tradition.</p><p></p><p>As for the performances, I was so-so for them. I still think Reeves was miscast for this role. However, if one's not familiar with the series, his casting was so-so. It was difficult to care for a person like him and the plight in which he finds himself in the beginning of the film. Who really cares if he's supposed to go to Hell or not unless there is a charisma to back up his situation. Sure, Reeves is soft on the eyes, but that's not going to help most movie goers care about his situation. The actor portraying this character needed to be charismatic as well as physically appealing in order for most people to be concerned about his situation.</p><p></p><p>Everyone else was fine. Weisz was fine, although I thought she was too much the damsel in distress. She was a cop for crying out loud; she needed to be tougher. We had the requisite sidekick deaths, although I never really understood why Gabriel thought it necessary to have Balthazar kill most of them. Some of the props, particularly the crucifix gun, were corny; if you're going to have something so visually ridiculous in so grim a film, there should have been an explanation for it.</p><p></p><p>Yet, in spite of these things, I didn't dislike the film. I like the fact that they were trying to keep the story cohesive. If there's one thing I hate in films, it's those that bounce around with too many characters. This one was almost studious in its commitment to telling a story and keeping everything within the proper context. I admired that about the film. For the most part, the material was handled in a fairly sophisticated fashion (although in the theatre in which I watched the film, Lucifer's behavior and mannerisms had one guy giggling the entire time). Plus, I have to be honest here, the subject matter's right up my alley.</p><p></p><p>All this in mind, I don't know if I like this... I know I don't hate it, but I don't know if I like it. I may have to see it again to figure it out.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="The Serge, post: 2049482, member: 4049"] I saw this on Friday. I usually walk out of every movie I've seen with a very firm perspective that changes little after the first viewing. This is the first time in a long time I walked out without a strong opinion and not sure if I liked it or hated it. I suppose from that perspective, I'd give it a C, but I don't know that that's fair. I have read quite a few of the [i]Hellblazer[/i] series upon which this material's based. However, I expect adaptations to capture the spirit and feel of the original source if not the precise story line, so I rarely walk into a film adaptation expecting whole sale accuracy. Some adaptations, like [i]X-Men[/i] and the original [i]Superman[/i], characters with whom I'm very familiar, work out just fine despite variations on the theme. Others, like most of the [i]Batman[/i] franchise to date, fail miserably. In [i]Constantine[/i], they managed to capture most of the visuals and concepts associated with DC's Vertigo stories (and, to a lesser extent, "mainstream" comics like the third series [i]The Spectre[/i]). Indeed, there were at least three different storylines from the series that were used in this film (the entire portion with Lucifer is taken from one of the best story arcs in the series). That said, I really don't know how well all of this was pulled off. I mean, the story meandered quite a bit and there's a lot of talk with strange, sudden moments of action. Frankly, I think a good 30 minutes could have been edited out of this. Secondly, while much of the FX were cool, some of it was lacking. The "soldier demons," for example, were interesting to look the first time... After that, not so much. In fact, considering the wealth of demonic images in this, I would have expected a more impressive variation on the demonic themes. I mean, Balthazar could have been like some kind of "Beelzebub" while we could have seen another demon that resembled a pit fiend. Lucifer himself was a particular letdown considering that he's supposed to be the most beautiful of all God's creations in Catholic tradition. As for the performances, I was so-so for them. I still think Reeves was miscast for this role. However, if one's not familiar with the series, his casting was so-so. It was difficult to care for a person like him and the plight in which he finds himself in the beginning of the film. Who really cares if he's supposed to go to Hell or not unless there is a charisma to back up his situation. Sure, Reeves is soft on the eyes, but that's not going to help most movie goers care about his situation. The actor portraying this character needed to be charismatic as well as physically appealing in order for most people to be concerned about his situation. Everyone else was fine. Weisz was fine, although I thought she was too much the damsel in distress. She was a cop for crying out loud; she needed to be tougher. We had the requisite sidekick deaths, although I never really understood why Gabriel thought it necessary to have Balthazar kill most of them. Some of the props, particularly the crucifix gun, were corny; if you're going to have something so visually ridiculous in so grim a film, there should have been an explanation for it. Yet, in spite of these things, I didn't dislike the film. I like the fact that they were trying to keep the story cohesive. If there's one thing I hate in films, it's those that bounce around with too many characters. This one was almost studious in its commitment to telling a story and keeping everything within the proper context. I admired that about the film. For the most part, the material was handled in a fairly sophisticated fashion (although in the theatre in which I watched the film, Lucifer's behavior and mannerisms had one guy giggling the entire time). Plus, I have to be honest here, the subject matter's right up my alley. All this in mind, I don't know if I like this... I know I don't hate it, but I don't know if I like it. I may have to see it again to figure it out. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Rate Constantine
Top