Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Million Dollar TTRPG Crowdfunders
Most Anticipated Tabletop RPGs Of The Year
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Enchanted Trinkets Complete--a hardcover book containing over 500 magic items for your D&D games!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Rate Kill Bill Volume 2
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Wrath of the Swarm" data-source="post: 1491473" data-attributes="member: 16402"><p>He's given us his position already, and he seems to feel that "extreme" violence reduces the quality of a film, or lowers it to a different level altogether compared to films that don't possess it. More to the point, he's not presenting this position as his own personal standard, but implies instead that this is an "objective" view that will hold across an entire culture.</p><p></p><p>That's merely annoying. His approval of <em>Passion</em> combined with this attitude is what's offensive.</p><p></p><p><em>Kill Bill</em> doesn't use violence as a way to compensate for poor plot development or flat characters. It's an inherent part of the movie's theme. It is a coherent, consistent story presented as a whole. Perhaps some people feel the theme itself lacks value, and that's fine, but the quality of the filmmaking has nothing to do with that. Others will be blinded by the violence and fail to notice the subtle meanings in the movie. That's fine too, and they can disapprove as they like. Shakespeare contains plenty of violence and sexual content intended to excite the peanut gallery, and he wasn't even considered a great dramatist until after his death. Are his works trashy, or great works of genius? Neither. They're trashy, great works of genius.</p><p></p><p>I'd bet we could sit down together, analyze <em>Kill Bill</em>, and come up with interesting ideas that were intentionally buried in its events. We could debate why stylistic choices were made, what messages were being sent, what the director was thinking. But the movie lacks hidden obsessions and unconscious messages - Tarantino clearly thought about what he was doing and was aware of why he chose as he did.</p><p></p><p>It's common knowledge among sociologists that people's beliefs about their beliefs often bear little resemblance to what they actually believe, and people rarely think enough about the differences between what they claim to think and how they actually act to notice this themselves. I don't think Kai Lord has thought at all about why he disapproves of the violence in <em>Kill Bill</em> while considering <em>Passion</em> a great movie despite its (IMO unnecessarily extreme) violence.</p><p></p><p>I wouldn't consider <em>Kill Bill</em> a classic in any sense, but it was a cleverly-made piece of cinema, and I don't appreciate people trashing it mindlessly.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Wrath of the Swarm, post: 1491473, member: 16402"] He's given us his position already, and he seems to feel that "extreme" violence reduces the quality of a film, or lowers it to a different level altogether compared to films that don't possess it. More to the point, he's not presenting this position as his own personal standard, but implies instead that this is an "objective" view that will hold across an entire culture. That's merely annoying. His approval of [i]Passion[/i] combined with this attitude is what's offensive. [i]Kill Bill[/i] doesn't use violence as a way to compensate for poor plot development or flat characters. It's an inherent part of the movie's theme. It is a coherent, consistent story presented as a whole. Perhaps some people feel the theme itself lacks value, and that's fine, but the quality of the filmmaking has nothing to do with that. Others will be blinded by the violence and fail to notice the subtle meanings in the movie. That's fine too, and they can disapprove as they like. Shakespeare contains plenty of violence and sexual content intended to excite the peanut gallery, and he wasn't even considered a great dramatist until after his death. Are his works trashy, or great works of genius? Neither. They're trashy, great works of genius. I'd bet we could sit down together, analyze [i]Kill Bill[/i], and come up with interesting ideas that were intentionally buried in its events. We could debate why stylistic choices were made, what messages were being sent, what the director was thinking. But the movie lacks hidden obsessions and unconscious messages - Tarantino clearly thought about what he was doing and was aware of why he chose as he did. It's common knowledge among sociologists that people's beliefs about their beliefs often bear little resemblance to what they actually believe, and people rarely think enough about the differences between what they claim to think and how they actually act to notice this themselves. I don't think Kai Lord has thought at all about why he disapproves of the violence in [i]Kill Bill[/i] while considering [i]Passion[/i] a great movie despite its (IMO unnecessarily extreme) violence. I wouldn't consider [i]Kill Bill[/i] a classic in any sense, but it was a cleverly-made piece of cinema, and I don't appreciate people trashing it mindlessly. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Rate Kill Bill Volume 2
Top