Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Rate Kill Bill
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ShinHakkaider" data-source="post: 1177869" data-attributes="member: 9213"><p>I see alot of people saying "not as good as Reservoir Dogs" but personally I think that RD is probably the most overrated of his films. It's decent enough, but it's not the end all be all that most people make it out to be. If the story for Kill Bill is thin and derivative then the story for RD is no less, maybe even more so. The whole crux of the movie is ripped directly from Ringo Lam's CITY ON FIRE and hiest movies gone wrong like Kubrick's THE KILLING. </p><p></p><p>I liked KILL BILL a little less than I liked Jackie Brown (which is probably the Best of Tarintino's films in terms of craft and structure, although it does lack the puchy dialogue of Fiction and Dogs) because it lacked pretention, because it is shamelessly nothing more than a 70's martial arts/chambara/revenge movie. And it's fun. Everyone complaing about the violence in this movie, unless they honestly didint know going in and even then they had to know that there is violence in Tarantino's films (I mean really, It's like going to see Goodfellas or Casino and complaining about the violence and the appearace of mobsters in those movies. The movie is called KILL BILL, not Fluffy Bill's Petting Zoo of Looooooove. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></p><p></p><p>I think that Tarintino made this movie for people like me who smiled from ear to ear when the Shaw Bros logo popped up on the screen or when It goes to the split screen (used frequently by Brian DePalma in Carrie, Dressed to Kill and Blow Out among others) during Elle Driver's visit to the Bride's hospital room. Or when he does what I call the Kung Fu Zoom on the Brides eyes when ever she confronts one of the other Deadly Vipers and they show the flashback of her assault in faded out brown. </p><p></p><p>I loved it because those little touches meant something to me. They refered directly to movie experiences growing up in NY and going to those ratty theaters on Times Square with the sticky floors and watching Fists of the White Lotus and Five Deadly Venoms. Even without that background I think that it still does what it's supposed to do, which is entertain. It's not supposed to be highbrow entertainment. It's a derivitive of the type of movies that highbrow and movie critics in general dont like.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ShinHakkaider, post: 1177869, member: 9213"] I see alot of people saying "not as good as Reservoir Dogs" but personally I think that RD is probably the most overrated of his films. It's decent enough, but it's not the end all be all that most people make it out to be. If the story for Kill Bill is thin and derivative then the story for RD is no less, maybe even more so. The whole crux of the movie is ripped directly from Ringo Lam's CITY ON FIRE and hiest movies gone wrong like Kubrick's THE KILLING. I liked KILL BILL a little less than I liked Jackie Brown (which is probably the Best of Tarintino's films in terms of craft and structure, although it does lack the puchy dialogue of Fiction and Dogs) because it lacked pretention, because it is shamelessly nothing more than a 70's martial arts/chambara/revenge movie. And it's fun. Everyone complaing about the violence in this movie, unless they honestly didint know going in and even then they had to know that there is violence in Tarantino's films (I mean really, It's like going to see Goodfellas or Casino and complaining about the violence and the appearace of mobsters in those movies. The movie is called KILL BILL, not Fluffy Bill's Petting Zoo of Looooooove. :) I think that Tarintino made this movie for people like me who smiled from ear to ear when the Shaw Bros logo popped up on the screen or when It goes to the split screen (used frequently by Brian DePalma in Carrie, Dressed to Kill and Blow Out among others) during Elle Driver's visit to the Bride's hospital room. Or when he does what I call the Kung Fu Zoom on the Brides eyes when ever she confronts one of the other Deadly Vipers and they show the flashback of her assault in faded out brown. I loved it because those little touches meant something to me. They refered directly to movie experiences growing up in NY and going to those ratty theaters on Times Square with the sticky floors and watching Fists of the White Lotus and Five Deadly Venoms. Even without that background I think that it still does what it's supposed to do, which is entertain. It's not supposed to be highbrow entertainment. It's a derivitive of the type of movies that highbrow and movie critics in general dont like. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Rate Kill Bill
Top