Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Rate Paizo as a Company!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Gothmog" data-source="post: 4393208" data-attributes="member: 317"><p>Hmm, I had to think about this for a minute, but after consideration, I had to say Paizo gets a 2.5 from me, but I'll be generous and round up to a 3. My reasons:</p><p></p><p>* Their fluff is decent, if somewhat cliche and vanilla. Nothing exceptional, but occasionally really campy and kinda dumb. Rise of the Runelords AP is a good exmaple of this, as are the last 2 years of Dungeon and Dragon. Nothing really bad, but nothing that stood out as really great either.</p><p></p><p>* Thier mechanics are average to occasionally very poor. Their stat blocks usually have some fairly obvious errors in them (and I'm not a statblock checker kind of guy), and they tend to design adventures for a very over-the-top power level. Paizo suffers very bady from "slap another template on it" monster syndrome, which I find a rather lazy way to add variety to adventures.</p><p></p><p>* I'm very leery of Pathfinder RPG. From reading Pathfinder Alpha, I don't think the folks at Paizo have a very good grasp of the problems inherent in the 3.x system. In fact, Pathfinder works to make the existing problems WORSE in many cases- and yes, I've played the Alpha rules as a player 4 times- I couldn't imagine trying to run it as a DM. </p><p></p><p>* From what I've seen and heard, their customer service is good, and whenever Erik Mona posts on these boards, he seems like a really nice, cool guy. Paizo also seems to listen to their fans fairly well, although I find most of the tastes of the Paizo staff not to my liking.</p><p></p><p>* One big negative is not necessarily from Paizo themselves, but from their fanboys. Wow, I thought some of the 4E fanboys could be elitist, confrontataional, and emotionally twitchy- they are nothing compared to some of the venom and vitriol I've looked at on the Paizo boards over the last 2 years, but especially since 4E came out. Those are the kind of people Paizo SHOULD NOT listen to if they want to keep any credibility. Again, not Paizo's fault, but hopefully the whackjobs have little influence with them, for the long-term sake of their company.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Gothmog, post: 4393208, member: 317"] Hmm, I had to think about this for a minute, but after consideration, I had to say Paizo gets a 2.5 from me, but I'll be generous and round up to a 3. My reasons: * Their fluff is decent, if somewhat cliche and vanilla. Nothing exceptional, but occasionally really campy and kinda dumb. Rise of the Runelords AP is a good exmaple of this, as are the last 2 years of Dungeon and Dragon. Nothing really bad, but nothing that stood out as really great either. * Thier mechanics are average to occasionally very poor. Their stat blocks usually have some fairly obvious errors in them (and I'm not a statblock checker kind of guy), and they tend to design adventures for a very over-the-top power level. Paizo suffers very bady from "slap another template on it" monster syndrome, which I find a rather lazy way to add variety to adventures. * I'm very leery of Pathfinder RPG. From reading Pathfinder Alpha, I don't think the folks at Paizo have a very good grasp of the problems inherent in the 3.x system. In fact, Pathfinder works to make the existing problems WORSE in many cases- and yes, I've played the Alpha rules as a player 4 times- I couldn't imagine trying to run it as a DM. * From what I've seen and heard, their customer service is good, and whenever Erik Mona posts on these boards, he seems like a really nice, cool guy. Paizo also seems to listen to their fans fairly well, although I find most of the tastes of the Paizo staff not to my liking. * One big negative is not necessarily from Paizo themselves, but from their fanboys. Wow, I thought some of the 4E fanboys could be elitist, confrontataional, and emotionally twitchy- they are nothing compared to some of the venom and vitriol I've looked at on the Paizo boards over the last 2 years, but especially since 4E came out. Those are the kind of people Paizo SHOULD NOT listen to if they want to keep any credibility. Again, not Paizo's fault, but hopefully the whackjobs have little influence with them, for the long-term sake of their company. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Rate Paizo as a Company!
Top