Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="CapnZapp" data-source="post: 7887104" data-attributes="member: 12731">The big thing is the shift away from &quot;player character supremacy&quot;.You can't easily see the ramifications of going from, what, 67% success rate on average in 5E to 50% in PF2. Monsters are generally outclassed in 5E (not your creations thou <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink&nbsp; &nbsp; ;)"&nbsp; data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /> ) but not in PF2. 5E monsters simply aren't built to handle characters equipped with all the goodies the PHB liberally hands out like candy.In stark contrast to the Monster Manual, the Bestiary comes across as written by people that knows exactly what PCs can do.Add the impact of level to PF2 coupled with the different rule for criticals, and you have a world of change. PF2 monsters are dangerous. Their abilities are to be respected.I can easily see how that doesn't exactly leap off the page when you just browse.Cheers</blockquote>

[QUOTE="CapnZapp, post: 7887104, member: 12731"] The big thing is the shift away from "player character supremacy". You can't easily see the ramifications of going from, what, 67% success rate on average in 5E to 50% in PF2. Monsters are generally outclassed in 5E (not your creations thou ;) ) but not in PF2. 5E monsters simply aren't built to handle characters equipped with all the goodies the PHB liberally hands out like candy. In stark contrast to the Monster Manual, the Bestiary comes across as written by people that knows exactly what PCs can do. Add the impact of level to PF2 coupled with the different rule for criticals, and you have a world of change. PF2 monsters are dangerous. Their abilities are to be respected. I can easily see how that doesn't exactly leap off the page when you just browse. Cheers [/QUOTE]

Verification