Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Rate Revenge of the Sith *SPOILERS*
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="LightPhoenix" data-source="post: 2288701" data-attributes="member: 115"><p>My feelings on the movie generally echo the camp of that it was an okay movie, but the directing sucked, the dialogue stunk, and that it probably would have been better if Lucas was just a writer, and not a director.</p><p> </p><p>After each of the prequels I left with the feeling of wanting to see the original trilogy again. With the first two, it was because I felt so underwhelmed, I wanted to get back some of that magic that was lost. With RotS, I wanted to see the whole of 3-6 back to back, as a cohesive story. It was a very refreshing feeling, despite my issues with the directing and dialogue. I felt like there was a glimmer of magic afterward that just wasn't there after the first two.</p><p> </p><p>I feel obliged at this point to discuss the movie by itself, though most of my thoughts are on the prequels as a whole. As always, the worst parts of the movie were Hayden and Natalie. Not because of the story, which I thought was acceptable... people do things for love that they wouldn't normally do otherwise. Rather, I think they have absolutely zero chemistry together, and that in general their acting just stunk. I don't blame either of them... I blame the director, since it's his job to set the tone and mood, and he needs to coax that in part out of the actors. I also think that they were rather dwarfed by the rest of the cast, which I chalk up to their lack of experience acting relative to everyone else.</p><p> </p><p>I loved the way the Jedi were portrayed... very far from the perfect ideal that they claimed to be. It also set up the big rift between Anakin and the council, which ties back to Episode 1. The padawan are presumably taken young, so young that they don't know real life, only the controlled faux-life the Jedi teach. Anakin has already lived a good deal of life, and the seed of what can only be called humanity is already growing. It's because of the council's denial of humanity that drives the rift between them, since Anakin rightly believes they won't understand his problems. Ursula LeGuin raised a similar point in the opening chapters of <em>The Other Wind </em>(and the end of <em>Tehanu</em>).</p><p> </p><p>I completely agree with everyone that says the passage of time was poorly handled.</p><p> </p><p>After watching Episode 3, I came away with three general thoughts about the prequels in my head. First, I felt that 1 and 2 made a lot more sense, and saw how they fit into the bigger picture much clearer, and I think that made the movies a little more enjoyable. The Jedi could have saved his mother, but didn't; why would he expect anything more for Padme? Similarly, his slaughter of the sandpeople echoed the slaughter of the Jedi - both groups effectively killed people he loved. The Jedi twice so, once with his mother and presumably once with Padme. He isn't driven by justice, he's driven by vengence and anger - literally the stuff of the dark side, as told by Yoda way back when.</p><p> </p><p>Secondly, I really feel that the first two prequels could have and should have been condensed into a single movie. TPM and AotC really seemed like the same movie to me, in that they tell Anakin's history, establish his character and set up RotS. Except that they both felt like they were dragging, even during the action scenes. RotS seemed a lot better paced to me, and while it wasn't perfect, I felt that it went by pretty well.</p><p> </p><p>Thirdly, all three of the prequels felt very sanitized to me. I think part of the charm of the original trilogy is that they feel very gritty, very real. It doesn't feel like the focus of the movies is on the cinematography, on the flash and glitz. Not everything is done perfectly so, and that gives it character. A character which I feel the prequels lack. That's really where I think Lucas went wrong. Somewhere along the line I think he decided that it wasn't about the story, but about the digital revolution and CGI and fancy crap that doesn't mean a thing when the story isn't there.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="LightPhoenix, post: 2288701, member: 115"] My feelings on the movie generally echo the camp of that it was an okay movie, but the directing sucked, the dialogue stunk, and that it probably would have been better if Lucas was just a writer, and not a director. After each of the prequels I left with the feeling of wanting to see the original trilogy again. With the first two, it was because I felt so underwhelmed, I wanted to get back some of that magic that was lost. With RotS, I wanted to see the whole of 3-6 back to back, as a cohesive story. It was a very refreshing feeling, despite my issues with the directing and dialogue. I felt like there was a glimmer of magic afterward that just wasn't there after the first two. I feel obliged at this point to discuss the movie by itself, though most of my thoughts are on the prequels as a whole. As always, the worst parts of the movie were Hayden and Natalie. Not because of the story, which I thought was acceptable... people do things for love that they wouldn't normally do otherwise. Rather, I think they have absolutely zero chemistry together, and that in general their acting just stunk. I don't blame either of them... I blame the director, since it's his job to set the tone and mood, and he needs to coax that in part out of the actors. I also think that they were rather dwarfed by the rest of the cast, which I chalk up to their lack of experience acting relative to everyone else. I loved the way the Jedi were portrayed... very far from the perfect ideal that they claimed to be. It also set up the big rift between Anakin and the council, which ties back to Episode 1. The padawan are presumably taken young, so young that they don't know real life, only the controlled faux-life the Jedi teach. Anakin has already lived a good deal of life, and the seed of what can only be called humanity is already growing. It's because of the council's denial of humanity that drives the rift between them, since Anakin rightly believes they won't understand his problems. Ursula LeGuin raised a similar point in the opening chapters of [i]The Other Wind [/i](and the end of [i]Tehanu[/i]). I completely agree with everyone that says the passage of time was poorly handled. After watching Episode 3, I came away with three general thoughts about the prequels in my head. First, I felt that 1 and 2 made a lot more sense, and saw how they fit into the bigger picture much clearer, and I think that made the movies a little more enjoyable. The Jedi could have saved his mother, but didn't; why would he expect anything more for Padme? Similarly, his slaughter of the sandpeople echoed the slaughter of the Jedi - both groups effectively killed people he loved. The Jedi twice so, once with his mother and presumably once with Padme. He isn't driven by justice, he's driven by vengence and anger - literally the stuff of the dark side, as told by Yoda way back when. Secondly, I really feel that the first two prequels could have and should have been condensed into a single movie. TPM and AotC really seemed like the same movie to me, in that they tell Anakin's history, establish his character and set up RotS. Except that they both felt like they were dragging, even during the action scenes. RotS seemed a lot better paced to me, and while it wasn't perfect, I felt that it went by pretty well. Thirdly, all three of the prequels felt very sanitized to me. I think part of the charm of the original trilogy is that they feel very gritty, very real. It doesn't feel like the focus of the movies is on the cinematography, on the flash and glitz. Not everything is done perfectly so, and that gives it character. A character which I feel the prequels lack. That's really where I think Lucas went wrong. Somewhere along the line I think he decided that it wasn't about the story, but about the digital revolution and CGI and fancy crap that doesn't mean a thing when the story isn't there. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Rate Revenge of the Sith *SPOILERS*
Top