Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="mhacdebhandia" data-source="post: 1651647" data-attributes="member: 18832">I gave it a 7. I really enjoyed the film, but I felt that perhaps a few elements left in the final cut were not as well-explored as they should have been.For example, Peter's relationship with his landlord's painfully-thin daughter. I think this should have either been cut entirely or followed to some kind of conclusion; it was not clear in the final cut of the film what this friendship meant to Peter. I mean, I personally think of it as demonstrating that there are other women in the world who Peter could date, but that's just a guess - there's not enough on the screen to make it clear, but at the same time it's a little too obvious to be considered a subtle point, considering how long the cake-eating scene takes. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)"  data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" />The action was very good, and everyone's performances were excellent, but it was perhaps a little bit too long. A second viewing (which might happen tomorrow) might cure me of that feeling, but I'm not sure.I rate the original as a 6, so this is a cut above it - in hindsight, it might qualify as an 8. For comparison, I give the Burton-Keaton Batman a 6 and Batman Returns a 7, and Spider-Man 2 is a cut above the latter, so I guess it does deserve an 8. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)"  data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></blockquote>

Verification