Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Rate this spell idea!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="AaronOfBarbaria" data-source="post: 6887302" data-attributes="member: 6701872"><p>My observations and comments, in as orderly a fashion as I can manage:</p><p></p><p>"You can use your attack action using your spell attack to make one attack with each Spear of Obsidian to a range of 20 feet." should be worded more in-line with what language existing spells use, especially because use of the Attack action implies that a multi-class character with Extra Attack actually gets additional attacks and likely a few other interactions the design of the game aims to avoid because they unbalance things.</p><p></p><p>Something like "You can use your action to make a melee spell attack with each Spear of Obsidian, which have a reach of 20 feet." if you intend these attacks to be melee attacks, or "You can use your action to make a ranged spell attack with each Spear of Obsidian at a range of 20 feet." if you intend these attacks to be ranged attacks.</p><p></p><p>As for the damage, as written it is above the recommended damage for a 3rd level spell - so either that should come down significantly, or the level of the spell should be raised (there are guidelines on page 283 of the DMG).</p><p></p><p>Additionally, the spell shouldn't be dealing as much damage as other spells of its same level and also providing defensive benefits.</p><p></p><p>Also, the scaling AC bonus: anything higher than a +2 makes this spell better at defense than most of the AC boosting spells, while it still gets offensive potential.</p><p></p><p>There is also the issue of the reactions to "block" attacks and spells: firstly that isn't a term that is used in the existing rules so it sticks out as undefined, and secondly that what you have done is almost like making a 3rd level spell that does the best damage of any 3rd level spells, gives more long-term AC than <em>shield of faith</em>, and gives you a free <em>counterspell</em> and <em>shield</em> in effect - so it's sort of the power of two 1st level spells, a 3rd level spell, and also a bunch of damage.</p><p></p><p>Of course, all of these thoughts are assuming that you don't intend upon changing the balance of the game dramatically, and aren't meaning to make this spell the uncontested best spell of its level.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="AaronOfBarbaria, post: 6887302, member: 6701872"] My observations and comments, in as orderly a fashion as I can manage: "You can use your attack action using your spell attack to make one attack with each Spear of Obsidian to a range of 20 feet." should be worded more in-line with what language existing spells use, especially because use of the Attack action implies that a multi-class character with Extra Attack actually gets additional attacks and likely a few other interactions the design of the game aims to avoid because they unbalance things. Something like "You can use your action to make a melee spell attack with each Spear of Obsidian, which have a reach of 20 feet." if you intend these attacks to be melee attacks, or "You can use your action to make a ranged spell attack with each Spear of Obsidian at a range of 20 feet." if you intend these attacks to be ranged attacks. As for the damage, as written it is above the recommended damage for a 3rd level spell - so either that should come down significantly, or the level of the spell should be raised (there are guidelines on page 283 of the DMG). Additionally, the spell shouldn't be dealing as much damage as other spells of its same level and also providing defensive benefits. Also, the scaling AC bonus: anything higher than a +2 makes this spell better at defense than most of the AC boosting spells, while it still gets offensive potential. There is also the issue of the reactions to "block" attacks and spells: firstly that isn't a term that is used in the existing rules so it sticks out as undefined, and secondly that what you have done is almost like making a 3rd level spell that does the best damage of any 3rd level spells, gives more long-term AC than [I]shield of faith[/I], and gives you a free [I]counterspell[/I] and [I]shield[/I] in effect - so it's sort of the power of two 1st level spells, a 3rd level spell, and also a bunch of damage. Of course, all of these thoughts are assuming that you don't intend upon changing the balance of the game dramatically, and aren't meaning to make this spell the uncontested best spell of its level. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Rate this spell idea!
Top