Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Rate this spell idea!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="crashtestdummy" data-source="post: 6887886" data-attributes="member: 6803354"><p>I'm looking at the latest version listed above and comparing it with <em>Haste</em>.</p><p></p><p>Concentration - check</p><p>One target (self in this case) - check</p><p>+2 AC - check</p><p>Bonus attack - sort of. I think this spell is a little more powerful than <em>Haste</em> in that respect. It provides four attacks, each doing 2d6 damage. Compared to <em>Haste</em> which would probably be cast on someone with two attacks, that's more powerful, but this spell requires the caster to be the one in melee (albeit with reach and using their spellcasting stat).</p><p></p><p>Other: This includes a slightly weakened version of Shield (+5 to AC) instead of the other benefits from <em>Haste</em></p><p></p><p>Overall, I would call it as a bit more powerful than <em>Haste</em>, which is already a top 3rd level spell. It may be better as a 4th level spell, rather than 3rd. Alternatively, having a material cost for each cast (such as the 50gp obsidian gem suggested above) would also help balance it out.</p><p></p><p>As for the question of why adding a verbal component, I would turn that around and ask why it shouldn't? Spells with no verbal component are relatively rare and have the advantage of being able to cast when silenced. What's so special about this spell that it should have that capability?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="crashtestdummy, post: 6887886, member: 6803354"] I'm looking at the latest version listed above and comparing it with [i]Haste[/i]. Concentration - check One target (self in this case) - check +2 AC - check Bonus attack - sort of. I think this spell is a little more powerful than [i]Haste[/i] in that respect. It provides four attacks, each doing 2d6 damage. Compared to [i]Haste[/i] which would probably be cast on someone with two attacks, that's more powerful, but this spell requires the caster to be the one in melee (albeit with reach and using their spellcasting stat). Other: This includes a slightly weakened version of Shield (+5 to AC) instead of the other benefits from [i]Haste[/i] Overall, I would call it as a bit more powerful than [i]Haste[/i], which is already a top 3rd level spell. It may be better as a 4th level spell, rather than 3rd. Alternatively, having a material cost for each cast (such as the 50gp obsidian gem suggested above) would also help balance it out. As for the question of why adding a verbal component, I would turn that around and ask why it shouldn't? Spells with no verbal component are relatively rare and have the advantage of being able to cast when silenced. What's so special about this spell that it should have that capability? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Rate this spell idea!
Top