Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Rate Van Helsing
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Henry" data-source="post: 1544437" data-attributes="member: 158"><p>I gave it an 8 - in truth, it was somewhere between a 7 and 8, but I gave it the benefit of the doubt.</p><p></p><p>It was DEFINITELY not better than the mummy, which was to me in the 9 to 10 range, but it was a fun ride, and it doesn't have to be in-depth psychodrama to be a good movie. THe Mummy had it all - adventure, romance, a clearly-driven plot, humor, well-choreographed fights, and the barest HINT of plausibility - I don't recall Rick or Evie getting knocked 70 feet into the air and getting back up, or swings from 500 foot tall towers where wind and elements would have finished off the hero long before the villain touched them. Loved Mummy, liked Van Helsing.</p><p></p><p>The actors I think did a good job overall. Beckinsale proved to me between this and Underworld that she could evoke a wide range of emotion, though Jackman really doesn't seem to play any differently to me, whether he's Wolverine or a computer hacker, or a monster hunter.</p><p></p><p>Richard Roxburgh,on the other hand, OWNED that film. I don't see flat when I see his performance - he and the three lady vampires CHEWED up the scenery when they we on camera, and it fit the genre so well that I loved it. Everything from his little "dance" while talking to the strapped-down Velkan, to his nervous pacing up the walls and ceilings, to dancing at the ball, he made himself the central focus of screen time when he appeared. Jackman was just standing around compared to him, and while I like Jackman, he really gave Van Helsing no character, even though the scripting tried.</p><p></p><p>Wenham (surprisingly FARAMIR from the Rings Films!!) did a very good job with Carl, and O'Connor (Beni from the Mummy, fascinating given the recent discussions!) was fun to watch as Igor. I recognized him under a ton of makeup by his voice within 10 seconds of seeing him onscreen.</p><p></p><p>Was it unrealistic? Of course! But then that was the style the movie was going for, and they nailed it well. The friendship between Van Helsing and the monster was a nice twist, and I really felt they cheated that part of the story by having the monster just paddling off into the distance. Where's the "goodbye my friend?" Where's the "where will you go?" Where's the "look me up if you're in London sometime?" and FOR GOD'S SAKE TURN THE VOLUME DOWN EVER SO SLIGHTLY!!! My wife and I could barely hear after two hours of BOOM-SCREAM-CREAK-BAMMM! <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></p><p></p><p>But I digress. In the end, a fun movie, worth the price.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Henry, post: 1544437, member: 158"] I gave it an 8 - in truth, it was somewhere between a 7 and 8, but I gave it the benefit of the doubt. It was DEFINITELY not better than the mummy, which was to me in the 9 to 10 range, but it was a fun ride, and it doesn't have to be in-depth psychodrama to be a good movie. THe Mummy had it all - adventure, romance, a clearly-driven plot, humor, well-choreographed fights, and the barest HINT of plausibility - I don't recall Rick or Evie getting knocked 70 feet into the air and getting back up, or swings from 500 foot tall towers where wind and elements would have finished off the hero long before the villain touched them. Loved Mummy, liked Van Helsing. The actors I think did a good job overall. Beckinsale proved to me between this and Underworld that she could evoke a wide range of emotion, though Jackman really doesn't seem to play any differently to me, whether he's Wolverine or a computer hacker, or a monster hunter. Richard Roxburgh,on the other hand, OWNED that film. I don't see flat when I see his performance - he and the three lady vampires CHEWED up the scenery when they we on camera, and it fit the genre so well that I loved it. Everything from his little "dance" while talking to the strapped-down Velkan, to his nervous pacing up the walls and ceilings, to dancing at the ball, he made himself the central focus of screen time when he appeared. Jackman was just standing around compared to him, and while I like Jackman, he really gave Van Helsing no character, even though the scripting tried. Wenham (surprisingly FARAMIR from the Rings Films!!) did a very good job with Carl, and O'Connor (Beni from the Mummy, fascinating given the recent discussions!) was fun to watch as Igor. I recognized him under a ton of makeup by his voice within 10 seconds of seeing him onscreen. Was it unrealistic? Of course! But then that was the style the movie was going for, and they nailed it well. The friendship between Van Helsing and the monster was a nice twist, and I really felt they cheated that part of the story by having the monster just paddling off into the distance. Where's the "goodbye my friend?" Where's the "where will you go?" Where's the "look me up if you're in London sometime?" and FOR GOD'S SAKE TURN THE VOLUME DOWN EVER SO SLIGHTLY!!! My wife and I could barely hear after two hours of BOOM-SCREAM-CREAK-BAMMM! :) But I digress. In the end, a fun movie, worth the price. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Rate Van Helsing
Top