Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="NotNew@Enworld" data-source="post: 1546453" data-attributes="member: 17263">IMO the combination of Dracula, Frankie and Moonpooch is just an excuse for a commercial smorgasboard like the last three Star Wars movies.&nbsp; But I think we've all heard that one before.I think the CGI was overdone.&nbsp; Stunts that would have been more credible with an old-fashioned stuntman were pixelized kinda like in Matrix Reloaded.And it seems the director (I won't mention his name) feels more comfortable spending ten million dollars on special effects than fifty cents on a decent script.Speaking of special effects, the action seemed to come out of nowhere and for no apparent reason other than to show off flashy cool funky CGI.Anna I found generally useless except when she hit that tree and got slammed against several walls.&nbsp; That was funny.That said, it was worth it for the silly entertainment function it filled.&nbsp; Good thing it only cost 4.5 euros.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="NotNew@Enworld, post: 1546453, member: 17263"] IMO the combination of Dracula, Frankie and Moonpooch is just an excuse for a commercial smorgasboard like the last three Star Wars movies. But I think we've all heard that one before. I think the CGI was overdone. Stunts that would have been more credible with an old-fashioned stuntman were pixelized kinda like in Matrix Reloaded. And it seems the director (I won't mention his name) feels more comfortable spending ten million dollars on special effects than fifty cents on a decent script. Speaking of special effects, the action seemed to come out of nowhere and for no apparent reason other than to show off flashy cool funky CGI. Anna I found generally useless except when she hit that tree and got slammed against several walls. That was funny. That said, it was worth it for the silly entertainment function it filled. Good thing it only cost 4.5 euros. [/QUOTE]

Verification