Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Rate WotC as a company
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Kzach" data-source="post: 4391076" data-attributes="member: 56189"><p>There have been comments in regards to why someone would be annoyed at a company for their practices, policies or products. The argument, "Don't like it, don't buy it," is a common one and in many instances I would agree with that.</p><p></p><p>However, to those people who feel that any sort of resentment or ill-feelings are misplaced or silly, I'd ask them to consider the following.</p><p></p><p>WotC is the undisputed king of our hobby. Love or loathe, they are the biggest and most successful. They have control over the oldest brand-name available in the industry and that carries with it a lot of weight. But it also carries a lot of responsibility.</p><p></p><p>They are the primary ambassadors of our hobby. But I ask you this: if you were nurturing a new player, someone who was completely new to RPG's, would you send them to Gleemax, or WotC's D&D website, or would you send them here?</p><p></p><p>Personally, I'd tell them flat out not to touch Gleemax or WotC's D&D site with a 100-ft. set of arms. I'd send them here, without hesitation or thought on the matter.</p><p></p><p>When a site run by volunteers is a better option than the primary industry leader's own website, don't you feel there is something wrong? That's not to disparage people here, but the simple fact is that they have far greater resources at their disposal, and yet ENW is still the better website and the better forum with the better posters and moderators.</p><p></p><p>And that is indicative of many things that have to do with WotC at the moment. That is only one example of many. The decisions WotC make don't just affect them as a company, they affect the hobby itself, and thus affect all of us who involve ourselves in it. That's the responsibility they bear as being the top dog. And therefore, they should be held accountable for their actions.</p><p></p><p>I think 4e is awesome, I love it. I'm a Mearl's fanboy and have in the past bought his stuff sight unseen because I know I'll love it. I think Wyatt and Heinsoo and the rest of the team are really talented designers. There is a lot of promise in 4e and I can see myself playing this system for years, whereas even at the very beginning, I had problems with 1e/2e and 3e and every other system I've tried.</p><p></p><p>But as a company, WotC has really let me down. The website, Gleemax, DDI, PDF costs, no errata on DM screen, 4 page character sheet sales, crappy paper in modules, non-durable ink and warping books, the GSL delay, the GSL itself, all have a negative impact on the hobby itself, not just us as consumers.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Kzach, post: 4391076, member: 56189"] There have been comments in regards to why someone would be annoyed at a company for their practices, policies or products. The argument, "Don't like it, don't buy it," is a common one and in many instances I would agree with that. However, to those people who feel that any sort of resentment or ill-feelings are misplaced or silly, I'd ask them to consider the following. WotC is the undisputed king of our hobby. Love or loathe, they are the biggest and most successful. They have control over the oldest brand-name available in the industry and that carries with it a lot of weight. But it also carries a lot of responsibility. They are the primary ambassadors of our hobby. But I ask you this: if you were nurturing a new player, someone who was completely new to RPG's, would you send them to Gleemax, or WotC's D&D website, or would you send them here? Personally, I'd tell them flat out not to touch Gleemax or WotC's D&D site with a 100-ft. set of arms. I'd send them here, without hesitation or thought on the matter. When a site run by volunteers is a better option than the primary industry leader's own website, don't you feel there is something wrong? That's not to disparage people here, but the simple fact is that they have far greater resources at their disposal, and yet ENW is still the better website and the better forum with the better posters and moderators. And that is indicative of many things that have to do with WotC at the moment. That is only one example of many. The decisions WotC make don't just affect them as a company, they affect the hobby itself, and thus affect all of us who involve ourselves in it. That's the responsibility they bear as being the top dog. And therefore, they should be held accountable for their actions. I think 4e is awesome, I love it. I'm a Mearl's fanboy and have in the past bought his stuff sight unseen because I know I'll love it. I think Wyatt and Heinsoo and the rest of the team are really talented designers. There is a lot of promise in 4e and I can see myself playing this system for years, whereas even at the very beginning, I had problems with 1e/2e and 3e and every other system I've tried. But as a company, WotC has really let me down. The website, Gleemax, DDI, PDF costs, no errata on DM screen, 4 page character sheet sales, crappy paper in modules, non-durable ink and warping books, the GSL delay, the GSL itself, all have a negative impact on the hobby itself, not just us as consumers. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Rate WotC as a company
Top