Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Rate WotC as a company
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Ruin Explorer" data-source="post: 4391860" data-attributes="member: 18"><p>ki11erDM - Your comments seem to be founded on a basis that we should automatically think well of, or respect corporations and businesses, even when their actions don't benefit us. This seems, to me, utterly without validity and bordering on the brain-washed. If this isn't your position, please explain, in detail, why you think we shouldn't complain about actual problems that a company has caused, or things it's failed to do, or inferior products it's produced?</p><p></p><p>As to the original question, I'm generally impressed with 4E. I have WotC a 3, though I'd have prefered a 3.5 (out of 5), but there are some really serious blemishes on their record that make me, as a consumer, less keen on purchasing their products, and less impressed with them as a company. Specifically:</p><p></p><p>1) DDI - This is still, long after it was supposed to be released, completely unfinished. All that we have is Dragon and Dungeon, and whilst it's nice that they're free and all, it's not at all impressive, given Paizo were able to do this without issues. The D&D Rules Compendium has become a poorly-edited non-rules, PC-creation/levelling-info-only compendium, which is weakly useful, at best. The other parts simply aren't there. The tabletop, the character generator, the dungeon builder? No sign of them, and they're what was important to me. I know my brother wanted the 4E PHB on the grounds that he'd be able to play online via. the DDI, and he was shocked to find out that it simply hadn't been implemented, and has absolutely no timeline/date for it's implementation. This brings me to my second issue.</p><p></p><p>2) The GSL - Extremely unfriendly, basically a lawyer's wet dream, and seems designed to intentionally "put off" major companies (and has been successful in doing so) from producing officially 4E-compatible material. It also doesn't allow for any software products, which ties in with the first problem - WotC is failing to provide software solutions, whilst simultaneously blocking others from providing them. This is a highly unsatisfactory situation. Unsatisfactory to WotC too, I'm sure, but there are ways out of it, and they're unwilling to take them.</p><p></p><p>3) Product quality - Outside of the "holy trinity", I've been unimpressed with product quality. KotS seems poorly written, is in a format that doesn't seem very helpful (the flimsy double-folder format), and the adventure itself is on the thinnest paper in gaming history, and smudges extremely easily. The character record sheets are simply a rip-off, and unworthy of WotC. Whilst it's very easy to say "Oh just print them out!", clearly someone who is buying the record sheets doesn't want to do that for whatever reason. That's not an excuse to rip them off! I'm concerned that we'll continue to see cheap, low-quality-seeming products like these. I'm also unimpressed that they seem to have released with quite SO many rather serious errata in the PHB and DMG. I like errata, especially in a "tightly-engineered" system like 4E, and I'd rather have them than not, but I'd also rather have waited a month or two more and gotten books with the corrections already in.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Ruin Explorer, post: 4391860, member: 18"] ki11erDM - Your comments seem to be founded on a basis that we should automatically think well of, or respect corporations and businesses, even when their actions don't benefit us. This seems, to me, utterly without validity and bordering on the brain-washed. If this isn't your position, please explain, in detail, why you think we shouldn't complain about actual problems that a company has caused, or things it's failed to do, or inferior products it's produced? As to the original question, I'm generally impressed with 4E. I have WotC a 3, though I'd have prefered a 3.5 (out of 5), but there are some really serious blemishes on their record that make me, as a consumer, less keen on purchasing their products, and less impressed with them as a company. Specifically: 1) DDI - This is still, long after it was supposed to be released, completely unfinished. All that we have is Dragon and Dungeon, and whilst it's nice that they're free and all, it's not at all impressive, given Paizo were able to do this without issues. The D&D Rules Compendium has become a poorly-edited non-rules, PC-creation/levelling-info-only compendium, which is weakly useful, at best. The other parts simply aren't there. The tabletop, the character generator, the dungeon builder? No sign of them, and they're what was important to me. I know my brother wanted the 4E PHB on the grounds that he'd be able to play online via. the DDI, and he was shocked to find out that it simply hadn't been implemented, and has absolutely no timeline/date for it's implementation. This brings me to my second issue. 2) The GSL - Extremely unfriendly, basically a lawyer's wet dream, and seems designed to intentionally "put off" major companies (and has been successful in doing so) from producing officially 4E-compatible material. It also doesn't allow for any software products, which ties in with the first problem - WotC is failing to provide software solutions, whilst simultaneously blocking others from providing them. This is a highly unsatisfactory situation. Unsatisfactory to WotC too, I'm sure, but there are ways out of it, and they're unwilling to take them. 3) Product quality - Outside of the "holy trinity", I've been unimpressed with product quality. KotS seems poorly written, is in a format that doesn't seem very helpful (the flimsy double-folder format), and the adventure itself is on the thinnest paper in gaming history, and smudges extremely easily. The character record sheets are simply a rip-off, and unworthy of WotC. Whilst it's very easy to say "Oh just print them out!", clearly someone who is buying the record sheets doesn't want to do that for whatever reason. That's not an excuse to rip them off! I'm concerned that we'll continue to see cheap, low-quality-seeming products like these. I'm also unimpressed that they seem to have released with quite SO many rather serious errata in the PHB and DMG. I like errata, especially in a "tightly-engineered" system like 4E, and I'd rather have them than not, but I'd also rather have waited a month or two more and gotten books with the corrections already in. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Rate WotC as a company
Top