Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
Meta - Forums About Forums
Meta
Rating as a ratio of replies to views?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Darraketh" data-source="post: 17020" data-attributes="member: 847"><p>One last comment/post on this subject then I'll put this baby to bed.</p><p></p><p>The suggestion is a way of using the space that is already there, the rating column, that is hardly used as it stands. </p><p></p><p>The ratio is <strong>not</strong> a rating but a simple statistic. It's just presenting the information, that is already shown, in <u>another</u> meaningful way.</p><p></p><p>It the ratio was presented I further suggest changing the column title from "Rating" to simply "Ratio" or something else more descriptive of its function.</p><p></p><p>Now as far as effecting the ratio as though it were a rating system the only thing you could do is post a reply. By viewing the thread and <u>not</u> replying the ratio decreases.</p><p></p><p>Either way it doesn't matter if the ratio is 1% or 100% it is just a statistic and not a rating. A rating requires a judgment call this would be an automatic function.</p><p></p><p>Just think of post counts. The count indicates a level of activity but in no way infers that what was posted was meaningful, useful or warranted. </p><p></p><p>The post count is a statistic not a rating.</p><p></p><p>The ration of replies to views is another statistic not a rating.</p><p></p><p>Stick a fork in me I'm done.<img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f600.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":D" title="Big grin :D" data-smilie="8"data-shortname=":D" /> </p><p></p><p><em>P.S. I love a good debate! Thanks</em></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Darraketh, post: 17020, member: 847"] One last comment/post on this subject then I'll put this baby to bed. The suggestion is a way of using the space that is already there, the rating column, that is hardly used as it stands. The ratio is [b]not[/b] a rating but a simple statistic. It's just presenting the information, that is already shown, in [u]another[/u] meaningful way. It the ratio was presented I further suggest changing the column title from "Rating" to simply "Ratio" or something else more descriptive of its function. Now as far as effecting the ratio as though it were a rating system the only thing you could do is post a reply. By viewing the thread and [u]not[/u] replying the ratio decreases. Either way it doesn't matter if the ratio is 1% or 100% it is just a statistic and not a rating. A rating requires a judgment call this would be an automatic function. Just think of post counts. The count indicates a level of activity but in no way infers that what was posted was meaningful, useful or warranted. The post count is a statistic not a rating. The ration of replies to views is another statistic not a rating. Stick a fork in me I'm done.:D [i]P.S. I love a good debate! Thanks[/i] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
Meta - Forums About Forums
Meta
Rating as a ratio of replies to views?
Top