Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
[+] Ravenloft, horror, & safety tools...
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="doctorbadwolf" data-source="post: 8260703" data-attributes="member: 6704184"><p>For tables with people who don't want to deal with racism in their escapist hobby and communicate that to the group/dm, yes. Simple as that.</p><p></p><p>And I wouldn't play in a game that is going to include helplessly being murdered, either. Losing a fight to the death is completely different from that, obviously. </p><p>Being mind-raped is also off the table. For some people, the visceral reaction to a thing only happens when it is directed at them. That isn't less valid than a universal reaction.</p><p></p><p>Me too! Doesn't mean I am okay with my PC being mind controlled. Getting to murder a mind-controlling evil slaving piece of garbage, on the other hand, I'm fine with.</p><p>My allies using abilities that are similar to mind control, but that explicitly don't take away their free will, like Charm Person which only changes your perception of someone and thus might as well be an illusion spell, I am judgmental about the use of, but they don't make me nearly as uncomfortable. At worst, they're a veil. </p><p></p><p>If a DM decided that they just aren't going to use or allow mind control in the game, to avoid the issue entirely, I'd be fine with that, but consider it a bit extreme and perhaps even a bit lazy of them, depending on the situation. Especially if they included things like Crown of Madness and Command. I've seen people include effects that stun, which is really extreme. I don't think [USER=86653]@overgeeked[/USER] is going nearly that far, as they've said that fear is also kinda boring for them but not a big deal, for instance.</p><p></p><p>No. NPCs aren't being embodied by the player who is uncomfortable with having their agency removed without their consent. If the DM has a thing with mind control, they are just as free as a player to ask the table not to use it on NPCs, or to only use it on nameless combat enemies, or whatever their actual line is.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="doctorbadwolf, post: 8260703, member: 6704184"] For tables with people who don't want to deal with racism in their escapist hobby and communicate that to the group/dm, yes. Simple as that. And I wouldn't play in a game that is going to include helplessly being murdered, either. Losing a fight to the death is completely different from that, obviously. Being mind-raped is also off the table. For some people, the visceral reaction to a thing only happens when it is directed at them. That isn't less valid than a universal reaction. Me too! Doesn't mean I am okay with my PC being mind controlled. Getting to murder a mind-controlling evil slaving piece of garbage, on the other hand, I'm fine with. My allies using abilities that are similar to mind control, but that explicitly don't take away their free will, like Charm Person which only changes your perception of someone and thus might as well be an illusion spell, I am judgmental about the use of, but they don't make me nearly as uncomfortable. At worst, they're a veil. If a DM decided that they just aren't going to use or allow mind control in the game, to avoid the issue entirely, I'd be fine with that, but consider it a bit extreme and perhaps even a bit lazy of them, depending on the situation. Especially if they included things like Crown of Madness and Command. I've seen people include effects that stun, which is really extreme. I don't think [USER=86653]@overgeeked[/USER] is going nearly that far, as they've said that fear is also kinda boring for them but not a big deal, for instance. No. NPCs aren't being embodied by the player who is uncomfortable with having their agency removed without their consent. If the DM has a thing with mind control, they are just as free as a player to ask the table not to use it on NPCs, or to only use it on nameless combat enemies, or whatever their actual line is. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
[+] Ravenloft, horror, & safety tools...
Top