Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Coroc" data-source="post: 7753993" data-attributes="member: 6895991">If this is real, in a way i am quite glad they did not rehash a classic setting. Otherwise it would be like remakes of old movies. It is rare, that a remake these days is more than adding advanced CGI effects. CGI effects transferred to pen and paper RPG is like modifying the picture in your mind. And adding flashy effects (dragoncelestialninjapiratehobbitkender on Athas e.g. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)"  data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /> )  seems to be the thing today (see everything they implemented in FR), and i do not want them in the picture in my mind of these settings and i do not want my Players getting this Pictures but rather the original tone which is good and diverse enough.What i still eagerly expect, is some hint on converting special game mechanics, psionics, defiling, dragonlances, dragonmarks e.g., and maybe some of the more complicated racial conversions (halfgiant / thrikreen). But i would not hope to much on these topics either, because someone playing Darksun or Greyhawk would not necessarily buy dragonheist, so for marketing reasons i can understand why they did not yet publish these  things.Otoh it would be nice of them communicating something like: we definetely will not publish anything on setting x, so you would know that if you are to Play this you Need to make your homebrew rules.</blockquote>

Verification