Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Re-balancing wizard at-wills
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Blackbrrd" data-source="post: 5057345" data-attributes="member: 63962"><p>Personally I think 3d4+int is too much damage for magic missile. I think the Invoker power that has 3 targets is pure cheese.</p><p></p><p>What about:</p><p>Target one or two people. One target = 2d4+int damage. Two targets = 1d4+int damage each. It can be used as a ranged basic but then it can only have one target.</p><p></p><p>Alternatly, because I like the three target idea, but I think it is too powerful:</p><p></p><p><strong>Magic Missile Wizard Attack 1</strong></p><p>You launch a silvery bolt of force at an enemy.</p><p><strong>At-Will</strong> ✦ Arcane, Force, Implement</p><p>Standard Action Ranged 10</p><p>Target: One, two or three creature within 3 squares of each other</p><p>Attack: Intelligence vs. Reflex</p><p>Hit: 1d4 + Intelligence modifier force damage. If you only have one target, increase the damage to 2d4 + Intelligence modifier.</p><p>Increase damage to 2d4 + Intelligence modifier at 21st level or 4d4 vs a single target.</p><p>Special: This power counts as a ranged basic attack. When a power allows you to make a ranged basic attack, you can</p><p>use this power. As a ranged basic attack you can only have one target.</p><p></p><p>That is maybe a bit over the top in utility for Wizard at-will power, but it shouldn't be too unbalancing.</p><p></p><p>"Within 3 squares of each other" is intended to mean you can hit all the x's here:</p><p>xox</p><p>ooo</p><p>xoo</p><p></p><p>But not here</p><p>xoox</p><p>xooo</p><p>oooo</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Blackbrrd, post: 5057345, member: 63962"] Personally I think 3d4+int is too much damage for magic missile. I think the Invoker power that has 3 targets is pure cheese. What about: Target one or two people. One target = 2d4+int damage. Two targets = 1d4+int damage each. It can be used as a ranged basic but then it can only have one target. Alternatly, because I like the three target idea, but I think it is too powerful: [B]Magic Missile Wizard Attack 1[/B] You launch a silvery bolt of force at an enemy. [B]At-Will[/B] ✦ Arcane, Force, Implement Standard Action Ranged 10 Target: One, two or three creature within 3 squares of each other Attack: Intelligence vs. Reflex Hit: 1d4 + Intelligence modifier force damage. If you only have one target, increase the damage to 2d4 + Intelligence modifier. Increase damage to 2d4 + Intelligence modifier at 21st level or 4d4 vs a single target. Special: This power counts as a ranged basic attack. When a power allows you to make a ranged basic attack, you can use this power. As a ranged basic attack you can only have one target. That is maybe a bit over the top in utility for Wizard at-will power, but it shouldn't be too unbalancing. "Within 3 squares of each other" is intended to mean you can hit all the x's here: xox ooo xoo But not here xoox xooo oooo [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Re-balancing wizard at-wills
Top