Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Re-examining the 5' step
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Woas" data-source="post: 4558892" data-attributes="member: 16317"><p>I forget what game it was from, but a couple years back I remember going over some rules for a game system I ran very briefly (I believe just one session) which had initiative set up in a neat way that I always liked.</p><p></p><p>The game had a cyclical order of combat much like D&D however the person with the highest "initiative" (it was called something else like perception or whatever. Can't remember it...) actually went LAST. In addition, the players would announce what their character was doing only but the action did not occur until after everyone had a chance to announce their action. Then you would resolve the actions either simultaneously or in reverse order (highest ot lowest), I can't recall.</p><p></p><p>So what that means is that the player with the lowest initiative would announce their move/action "Jorzan is going to run here.. blah blah" and the second lowest initiative and so on up the line. The benefit granted to the characters with a high initiative the ability of knowing what their targets were doing so they could react accordingly.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Taking this to a D&D example, an Orc with the higher initiative standing next to a wizard. The player of the wizard would actually state his/her actions first, even though the orc is technically 'faster'. So, going with the example from earlier in the thread, "Jorzan the Wizard moves 5' back and begins to prepare a burning hand spell at the orc!". But not actually role dice or do it yet.</p><p>Then the Orc (DM playing as the orc) would announce their move with full knowledge of what Jorzan has done and announce perhaps, "Seeing the wizard back away, the orc follows, axe overhead and strikes at the wizard and his hex!"</p><p>Then you would resolve them moving together (i sort of remember movement actions were resolved sort of simultaneously while other actions were resolved highest to lowest) and then the orcs swing would happen first, and then if that attack from the orc didn't kill or stop the wizard from casting the spell, the spell would then go off.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Well then. That was sort of a wordy description and not was not as slow and clunky to play as it reads... I thought it was a pretty neat system.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Woas, post: 4558892, member: 16317"] I forget what game it was from, but a couple years back I remember going over some rules for a game system I ran very briefly (I believe just one session) which had initiative set up in a neat way that I always liked. The game had a cyclical order of combat much like D&D however the person with the highest "initiative" (it was called something else like perception or whatever. Can't remember it...) actually went LAST. In addition, the players would announce what their character was doing only but the action did not occur until after everyone had a chance to announce their action. Then you would resolve the actions either simultaneously or in reverse order (highest ot lowest), I can't recall. So what that means is that the player with the lowest initiative would announce their move/action "Jorzan is going to run here.. blah blah" and the second lowest initiative and so on up the line. The benefit granted to the characters with a high initiative the ability of knowing what their targets were doing so they could react accordingly. Taking this to a D&D example, an Orc with the higher initiative standing next to a wizard. The player of the wizard would actually state his/her actions first, even though the orc is technically 'faster'. So, going with the example from earlier in the thread, "Jorzan the Wizard moves 5' back and begins to prepare a burning hand spell at the orc!". But not actually role dice or do it yet. Then the Orc (DM playing as the orc) would announce their move with full knowledge of what Jorzan has done and announce perhaps, "Seeing the wizard back away, the orc follows, axe overhead and strikes at the wizard and his hex!" Then you would resolve them moving together (i sort of remember movement actions were resolved sort of simultaneously while other actions were resolved highest to lowest) and then the orcs swing would happen first, and then if that attack from the orc didn't kill or stop the wizard from casting the spell, the spell would then go off. Well then. That was sort of a wordy description and not was not as slow and clunky to play as it reads... I thought it was a pretty neat system. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Re-examining the 5' step
Top