Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Hashmalum" data-source="post: 1006015" data-attributes="member: 9450">Well, there's only one reversible 1st level sorcerer/wizard spell pair on the list (enlarge/reduce), but if some more reversible spells were converted from 2nd Edition this would indeed be a problem. So I took your advice and set the Spellcraft req to 6 ranks (which is higher than Energy Substitution, but the difference between a substituted and a reversed spellis is greater IMO).I also ditched the ability to cast spells not on your class list because I realized that it would lead to arcane casters being able to cast remove blindness/deafness (with greater efficiency than divine casters, even!) and cure disease, which I did not consider desirable.One other thing occurred to me: as I have it written now, I don't see any reason why a cleric couldn't take Reversible Spell and gain the ability to spontaneously cast both cure and inflict spells (although admittedly they wouldn't really derive much else in the way of benefit from the feat--I suppose it would also be useful when the cleric reached epic levels and took Spontaneous Domain Access). Using the feat with your spontaneously cast spells does increase their casting time, though. Does this make the feat too powerful?Thank you <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)"&nbsp; data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /> I've done some other &quot;2E feel&quot; feats, but I'll wait to post them until I get a look at 3.5E and see if they need any changes.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Hashmalum, post: 1006015, member: 9450"] Well, there's only one reversible 1st level sorcerer/wizard spell pair on the list ([I]enlarge/reduce[/I]), but if some more reversible spells were converted from 2nd Edition this would indeed be a problem. So I took your advice and set the Spellcraft req to 6 ranks (which is higher than Energy Substitution, but the difference between a substituted and a reversed spellis is greater IMO). I also ditched the ability to cast spells not on your class list because I realized that it would lead to arcane casters being able to cast [I]remove blindness/deafness[/I] (with greater efficiency than divine casters, even!) and [I]cure disease[/I], which I did not consider desirable. One other thing occurred to me: as I have it written now, I don't see any reason why a cleric couldn't take Reversible Spell and gain the ability to spontaneously cast both [I]cure[/I] and [I]inflict[/I] spells (although admittedly they wouldn't really derive much else in the way of benefit from the feat--I suppose it would also be useful when the cleric reached epic levels and took Spontaneous Domain Access). Using the feat with your spontaneously cast spells does increase their casting time, though. Does this make the feat too powerful? Thank you :) I've done some other "2E feel" feats, but I'll wait to post them until I get a look at 3.5E and see if they need any changes. [/QUOTE]

Verification