Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="anonystu" data-source="post: 782490" data-attributes="member: 10897">I would recommend against using Romance as a background: it obviously describes your state (although how far along from crush to boyfriend to husband is still sort of open), but the Romance indicates some conflict, and so as far as I can tell, my ways to do this would be to have one of you have two people you're interested in (one controlled by me). The romantic interest in danger plot is hard to to do ,since the two of you rascals are already in danger all the time, all day long. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)"&nbsp; data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" />In any case, unless they're a specific angle I can exploit, it's probably not a very good background. The secret identity thing is fine, and I'd maybe consider working off your vigilante days a bit if you're stuck for ideas.Jewelers probably do have rights to carry daggers, and other very small weapons that can be quasi justified as implements.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="anonystu, post: 782490, member: 10897"] I would recommend against using Romance as a background: it obviously describes your state (although how far along from crush to boyfriend to husband is still sort of open), but the Romance indicates some conflict, and so as far as I can tell, my ways to do this would be to have one of you have two people you're interested in (one controlled by me). The romantic interest in danger plot is hard to to do ,since the two of you rascals are already in danger all the time, all day long. :) In any case, unless they're a specific angle I can exploit, it's probably not a very good background. The secret identity thing is fine, and I'd maybe consider working off your vigilante days a bit if you're stuck for ideas. Jewelers probably do have rights to carry daggers, and other very small weapons that can be quasi justified as implements. [/QUOTE]

Verification