Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Seravin" data-source="post: 1503363" data-attributes="member: 6783">First let me say that I've followed your recent XPH threads with interest.  I haven't always agreed with you, but your position has always been thought out and articulate.  However I have to agree with Hardhead, and say it looks like you've gone a bit too far the other way with the PP and Power Known reductions.  One or the other might be fine but not both.  I think I'm starting to like moving the their highest spell slot gains to the even levels though.I'm not a fan of splitting the Stat Dependancies in general either - if only because none of the other core classes have to worry about it for their spell casting.  For flavor, I suppose it's all right but I think it's just going too far considering everything else.Concerning Expanded Knowledge - I would open it up to all the lists as before and if you have a problem with psion's expanding their power's known beyond their own lists, just take it off the bonus feat list.  I like Hardhead's idea of opening it up for the Wilder, but I dislike making a feat work differently for two different classes.Finally, Greater Metamorphisis - edit: I had forgotten about the 3.5 PHB errata to Shapechange.  In light of that, your rule makes perfect sense.Those would be my only comments.    I still haven't been convinced that the psions as presented are too overpowered though.  I'm hoping I can get one of my players to run a psion so I can get some actual playtesting done.  Better yet, I'd like to run one just to take it out for a spin.</blockquote>

Verification